Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgfs aborted with the dc3

2004-08-02 Thread Boris Koenig
Ron Lange wrote: Hallo Boris, Boris Koenig schrieb: More precisely the file with the checksums for 0.9.5final is at: http://www.geocities.com/sandreas41/data/fgfs-base-0.9.5.md5.gz I've just patched with this file and everything seems to be right. Alright, thanks for providing feedback !

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ..update script tardiff (or cvs) idea, was: fgfs aborted with the dc3

2004-08-02 Thread Boris Koenig
Arnt Karlsen wrote: On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 20:31:49 +0200, Boris wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: one other thing: I mentioned already that I didn't have the original pre-release available to create that patch, meanwhile Stewart Steven have released a patch that's based on the _original_

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear v0.9.5

2004-08-02 Thread Martin Spott
Martin Spott wrote: The package is present at the usual place: ftp://ftp.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Solaris/fgfs-0.9.5-Solaris.tar.gz Curt, this package already includes the GCC runtime libraries - not need anymore to download the GCC-3.3 runtime package as advised on the FlightGear

Re: [Flightgear-devel] RFD: how to handle add-on ground scenery distribution

2004-08-02 Thread Jon Stockill
Erik Hofman wrote: Yes. Maintaining can be done using CVS and when the official release is out it can be just a matter of letting a script generate the tarballs for the static scenery. It may be something which would benefit from a more regular snapshot though - so that new scenery is available

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ..update script tardiff (or cvs) idea, was: fgfs aborted with the dc3

2004-08-02 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 08:18:00 +0200, Boris wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Arnt Karlsen wrote: On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 20:31:49 +0200, Boris wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: one other thing: I mentioned already that I didn't have the original pre-release available to create that

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ..update script tardiff (or cvs) idea, was: fgfs aborted with the dc3

2004-08-02 Thread Boris Koenig
A short message for Arnt ! Arnt Karlsen wrote: On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 08:18:00 +0200, Boris wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Arnt, how about starting to actually *read* my postings - at least those that you reply to ? :-) ..heh, good catch, could looong length be an issue? ;-) in general I'd

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Data source battle?

2004-08-02 Thread Jim Wilson
Jon Berndt said: I don't use real weather because most of my flying is to test the fdms I'm working on, Just so I am clear, when you say fdms are you referring to Flight Dynamics Model source code, or are you referring to something I'd call an Aircraft Flight Model (AFM) or Aircraft

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Yasim strangeness

2004-08-02 Thread Jim Wilson
Matthew Law said: David Megginson wrote: I cannot reproduce it on my system: fgfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] --aircraft=j3cub I put on the parking brake (who'd have thought the J3 Cub had a parking brake?) and tried moving all of the control surfaces. They had no effect on the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Data source battle?

2004-08-02 Thread Jon S Berndt
Jim Wilson wrote: If it wasn't for the great work on JSBsim and YASim we'd have very few aircraft. But I think those config files, along with the source code that ends up interpreting and processing them, both make up the FDMs. There is considerable skill and effort involved in producing

[Flightgear-devel] Flight Instrument Accuracy

2004-08-02 Thread John Wojnaroski
Jim Wilson writes: If it wasn't for the great work on JSBsim and YASim we'd have very few aircraft. But I think those config files, along with the source code that ends up interpreting and processing them, both make up the FDMs. There is considerable skill and effort involved in producing

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flight Instrument Accuracy

2004-08-02 Thread Jim Wilson
John Wojnaroski said: Jim Wilson writes: If it wasn't for the great work on JSBsim and YASim we'd have very few aircraft. But I think those config files, along with the source code that ends up interpreting and processing them, both make up the FDMs. There is considerable skill and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flight Instrument Accuracy

2004-08-02 Thread John Wojnaroski
- Original Message - From: Jim Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FlightGear developers discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 2:58 PM Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flight Instrument Accuracy John Wojnaroski said: Jim Wilson writes: If it wasn't for the great

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flight Instrument Accuracy

2004-08-02 Thread Jim Wilson
John Wojnaroski said: - Original Message - From: Jim Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FlightGear developers discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 2:58 PM Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flight Instrument Accuracy John Wojnaroski said: Jim Wilson writes:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ..update script tardiff (or cvs) idea, was: fgfs aborted with the dc3

2004-08-02 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 16:08:52 +0200, Boris wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: A short message for Arnt ! ..Winston Churchill had a great way of having bureaucrats trim their language; it had to be readable without glasses, from across the room, on one sheet of paper, nailed to the wall. ;-)

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flight Instrument Accuracy

2004-08-02 Thread Lee Elliott
On Monday 02 August 2004 21:22, John Wojnaroski wrote: Jim Wilson writes: If it wasn't for the great work on JSBsim and YASim we'd have very few aircraft. But I think those config files, along with the source code that ends up interpreting and processing them, both make up the FDMs.

[Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] updated ThrustMaster FCS config

2004-08-02 Thread Eric L Hathaway
Hello all, The following patch updates the ThrustMaster FCS joystick configuration. I have Nasal-ized the joystick bindings, drawing ideas from the Cyborg-Gold-3d-USB configuration file. I also changed some of the bindings, so the joystick setup is more like the default four-axis-joystick