Paul Surgeon wrote:
I'm not complaining about the sloping runways - I absolutely love it!
Me too.
In fact that was the number one feature that stood out to me when I first
tried FlightGear. Whoever did the coding (Curt?) did a great job.
It's just a pain from a programming point of view to work
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:41:10 +0800, Yu wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to show the trajectory the aircraft just flied when start
> replaying. Is there anybody who had ever done that?
..like Klog? ' apt-get install klog ', if you use debian sid,
otherwise see http:/
Hi,
I am trying to show the trajectory the aircraft just flied when start
replaying. Is there anybody who had ever done that? Or could you give me
some ideas about the solution?
I have successfully draw "points" along the trajectory by this way:
- In replay.hxx, define:
ssgRoot * _scene;
ssgSele
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 19:42, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> It's not obviously a path problem. My preferences.xml file was updated at
> 15:22 yesterday, and has the right paths to the new generic files. However,
> the properties relating to instruments are empty - hence broken instruments
>
> :-). But
I'm not complaining about the sloping runways - I absolutely love it!
In fact that was the number one feature that stood out to me when I first
tried FlightGear. Whoever did the coding (Curt?) did a great job.
It's just a pain from a programming point of view to work with "real values".
Paul
On
Paul Surgeon wrote:
While we're on the taxiway topic ...
I've been toying around with some taxiway ideas over the last couple of days
after having played with David's TaxiDraw app.
TaxiDraw is an excellent piece of work but I really don't like the way
TerraGear/FlightGear create and handle taxiwa
On Tuesday, 19 October 2004 17:57, Chris Metzler wrote:
> I'm wondering whether we know what the X-Plane format really *is*.
> Since the beginning of September, Robin Peel has been saying that a
> new set of files are coming out "next weekend, September 18." But he
> ...
If we start doing some ma
* Curtis L. Olson -- Tuesday 19 October 2004 20:00:
> Syd Adams just submitted a DeHavilland DHC-2 Beaver for inclusion in CVS.
Very well done!
> - It has a full animated 3d cockpit.
Unfortunately, the ac3d/crease patch does only leave black holes where the
instruments should be. Looks very ni
Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> Sent: 18 October 2004 19:38
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] status of aircraft carrier
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On Donnerstag 14 Oktober 2004 17:59, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> > Mathias Fröhlich wrote a long time ago:
> ... sadly yes.
>
>
While we're on the taxiway topic ...
I've been toying around with some taxiway ideas over the last couple of days
after having played with David's TaxiDraw app.
TaxiDraw is an excellent piece of work but I really don't like the way
TerraGear/FlightGear create and handle taxiways.
Yes, they are s
Syd Adams just submitted a DeHavilland DHC-2 Beaver for inclusion in CVS.
I've had a chance to take it for a spin and it is really nice.
- It has a full animated 3d cockpit.
- The interior is modeled, including an appropriate cargo load.
- It is setup with floats which work ok, but we really need s
Vivian Meazza wrote:
> Sent: 19 October 2004 10:34
> To: 'FlightGear developers discussions'
> Subject: RE: [Flightgear-devel] Submodels
>
>
>
> Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
> > Sent: 19 October 2004 09:54
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Submodels
> >
> > On Tuesday 1
David Culp wrote:
I think it would be best if the submodel system is moved out of the Systems
directory altogether and made into a subsystem, like the AI manager. The
only reason I put it with the systems originally is that I first used it to
model a gun. It quickly became generalized to inclu
Hi Dave. This is great work. Seriously, it's a fabulous contribution,
and I'm pumped to get started using it. I have a couple of quick
questions:
> Version 0.2.2 fixes several serious bugs in the X-Plane format writer
> present in 0.2.0 and 0.2.1. All users should upgrade, since X-Plane
> for
Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
> Sent: 19 October 2004 09:54
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Submodels
>
> On Tuesday 19 October 2004 09:47, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> > > > What instruments are not working, and what inputs do they use?
> >
> > Hunter/Seahawk:
> > Altimeter, IAS,
"Vivian Meazza" wrote:
> I think most gyros are electrical. Certainly in the 40's/50's.
Really ? From what I've learnt electrically driven gyros are sort of a
modern invention where aircraft manufactures tend to rely more and more
on a working electrical system
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user f
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> Could you tell us how this package was done. Is it released plib 1.8.3
> patched or is it CVS patched ?
It is CVS from 20041010, patched primarily with Mathias' "crease"-
patch, a small joystick-change that floated around on october 12th and
now
Selon Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "Vivian Meazza" wrote:
> > Frederic Bouvier wrote:
>
> > > Martin made this package. But you can try to remove the local Autom4te
> > > directory in your plib directory.
> >
> > That seemed to work: so far so good.
>
> Is this a viable solution for everyon
"Vivian Meazza" wrote:
> Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> > Martin made this package. But you can try to remove the local Autom4te
> > directory in your plib directory.
>
> That seemed to work: so far so good.
Is this a viable solution for everyone (who uses this package) ?
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user
On Sunday 17 October 2004 02:18 pm, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I've not touched the new submodel.*xx sources yet because I want your
> opinion on how I should implement it into the other configurable systems.
>
> The existing configurable systems are the pitot, static, and vacuum
> syst
TaxiDraw-0.2.2 is now released. Versions 0.2.2 and 0.2.1 fix several
serious bugs in v0.2.0 - all users should upgrade. TaxiDraw is available
from http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/~eazdluf/taxidraw.html Changes are as
below:
* 0.2.2 ***
Version 0.2.2 fixes several serious bugs i
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Geometry is compiled into display lists
#if PLIB_VERSION > 183
Erik, shouldn't it be
#if PLIB_VERSION >= 183
? plib 1.8.4 is not released yet, it is only CVS.
I've had problems with display lists in the past. I am really not sure
whether display lists work well with plib 18
Vivian Meazza wrote:
>
>
> Vivian Meazza wrote:
> > Sent: 18 October 2004 20:16
> > To: 'FlightGear developers discussions'
> > Subject: RE: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Linux joystick problem
> > followingrecentplibjs updates
> >
> > Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> >
> > > Sent: 18 October 2004 18:59
> > > T
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 09:47, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> > > What instruments are not working, and what inputs do they use?
>
> Hunter/Seahawk:
> Altimeter, IAS, Mach, rate-of-climb, and turn-and-slip
>
When I checked the Hunter and Seahawk last night all these instruments worked.
IIRC the Mach in
Vivian Meazza wrote:
> Sent: 18 October 2004 20:16
> To: 'FlightGear developers discussions'
> Subject: RE: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Linux joystick problem
> followingrecentplibjs updates
>
> Frederic Bouvier wrote:
>
> > Sent: 18 October 2004 18:59
> > To: FlightGear developers discussions
> > S
- Original Message -
From: "Frederic Bouvier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FlightGear developers discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 12:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] VBOs - performance test results
> Roman Grigoriev wrote:
>
> >
> > - Original Messag
Roman Grigoriev wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Frederic Bouvier
>
>
> > Roman Grigoriev wrote:
> > > Frederic! I must admit that you are absolutly right with Dlists I got
> 107
> > > fps and only 78 fps w/ VBO on 5950Ultra
> > > It's w/o shaders. I make additional test And tell r
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flightgear-devel-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roy Vegard Ovesen
> Sent: 19 October 2004 00:55
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Submodels
>
> On Tuesday 19 October 2004 01:00, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
> >
28 matches
Mail list logo