Drew wrote
And a red one for -ve G. With a bit of texture.
I never liked the 'red-out' in simulators...do pilot's really see red?
I thought it was just called red-out because of excess blood to the
brain.
In any case, I thought of the same thing, myself (using this for GLOC).
I don't buy that argument. It's easier to grow with fgfs in small
steps than to adapt everything after major releases. Following the
cvslogs mailing list is usually enough, and there isn't such a fast
progress anyway.
Ok, I'm trying to take your advice, and get a later version of the source.
Drew a écrit :
I don't buy that argument. It's easier to grow with fgfs in small
steps than to adapt everything after major releases. Following the
cvslogs mailing list is usually enough, and there isn't such a fast
progress anyway.
Ok, I'm trying to take your advice, and get a later version
Drew wrote:
I tried downloading the tar archive of the latest CVS flightear, but
it doesn't compile with the latest release of SimGear. Is there an
archive somewhere of a development SimGear version, or will I have
to install a CVS client to get this code? I'm using Windows, and
have never
This isn't wasted time. Learning to use CVS to synch to open source
projects will be a skill you use for the rest of your life (or at
least until everyone moves onto subversion or darcs or arch or
whatever). Like it or not, limiting yourself to released versions of
software kinda makes you
It is very easy with this tool : http://www.wincvs.org/download.html
When using CVS, you have to keep SimGear, FlightGear and the data in
sync, but it is just a few click with Wincvs.
-Fred
Thanks for the help. I think I'll put this on hold right now, and try
it during the weekend when I
Frederic Bouvier wrote
Drew a écrit :
I don't buy that argument. It's easier to grow with fgfs in small
steps than to adapt everything after major releases. Following the
cvslogs mailing list is usually enough, and there isn't such a fast
progress anyway.
Ok, I'm trying to take
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 08:51:32AM -0500, Corrubia, Stacie K wrote:
Hi ---
I am having a problem generating airports within TerraGear. I have been
following the recipe from the TerraGear.README file and downloaded Robin
Peel's database of airports and managed to create the basic.dat
Hi,
I'm having the same problem as described in
http://baron.flightgear.org/pipermail/terragear-devel/2004-September/001035.html
I know the workaround of editing material.xml, but somehow I refuse to believe
that this is the only way. I get the same messages about loading the right
texture
Vivian Meazza wrote:
The attached diff models the output of a gear-driven
supercharger
I just now got a chance to sit down and puzzle this out. I see where
it's going: instead of ignoring the RPM contribution to boost, it adds
an extra factor that reduces the boost at lower RPMs. It works by
Andy Ross wrote:
Vivian Meazza wrote:
The attached diff models the output of a gear-driven
supercharger
I just now got a chance to sit down and puzzle this out. I see where
it's going: instead of ignoring the RPM contribution to boost, it adds
an extra factor that reduces the boost at
I have been meaning to ask this for a while:
Does anybody know what happened to the project? Whoever was working on it
seems to have just diappeared.
Ampere
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
Vivian Meazza wrote:
I used the power form because it is easier to read, but if the other
form produces a performance advantage, then of course we must use
it.
It's actually not so much about performance, really. Readability can
mean different things. The problem is that when I see a
Andy Ross writes:
Vivian Meazza wrote:
I used the power form because it is easier to read, but if the other
form produces a performance advantage, then of course we must use
it.
It's actually not so much about performance, really. Readability can
mean different things. The problem
I passed my instrument rating oral and practical (check ride) this
afternoon. Five hours including the oral and ride. Boy was I glad I
had done many approaches with the turbulence turned up as all the
approaches were in moderate turbulence today with 20 gust to 35 kts and
wind shear. The
From: Curtis L. Olson
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
I am not here to endorse Microsoft choices, but I see little point to use C
syntax when C++ is available and is the language of choice for the overall
FlightGear project. However, the link below should clarify Microsoft point of
view :
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 19:46:10 -0400, Norman wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Andy Ross writes:
Whereas this one is just really obviously a polynomial, and I
understand polynomials, they're simple and not scary at all:
rpm_norm * (1.11 - rpm_norm * (0.15 * rpm_norm + 0.25))
17 matches
Mail list logo
