Melchior FRANZ wrote:
No. plib has a bug: it doesn't recognize grayscale images with alpha layer yet.
See ssgLoadSGI.cxx:301, where the alpha information is wrongly written to the
blue layer, while the alpha layer is disabled. :-]
Ah -- that explains what's going on here. I had thought that the
Frederic BOUVIER wrote:
Another thing that I noticed about the pa28 panel was the plane in the
TC was not transparent where it should be. The rgb file did have an
alpha channel but because the file was only 256 colors the alpha channel
was not transparent in FlightGear. It was OK when I opened it
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:03:00 -0500, David Megginson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Frederic BOUVIER wrote:
I don't know for the original bug reporter, but I am using Windows and
NVIDIA if it is of any importance.
That could matter -- I'm using Linux and NVIDIA. Do you have trouble
with transparen
* Frederic BOUVIER -- Friday 12 March 2004 16:24:
> I guess Melchior use Linux and he post a screenshot of what I am seeing.
plib bug. I'm working on a fix.
m.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listi
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Melchior FRANZ -- Friday 12 March 2004 15:59:
All needles are OK. The only bug that I see is the non-transparent
attitude 'needle': http://members.aon.at/mfranz/pa28.jpg
The SGI image seems to be OK, though (and I'm an SGI image expert :-).
I'll look into plib ...
Yep, look
David Megginson wrote :
> Melchior FRANZ wrote:
>
> > All needles are OK. The only bug that I see is the non-transparent
> > attitude 'needle': http://members.aon.at/mfranz/pa28.jpg
>
> Yes -- I have that problem as well -- it has something to do with drawing order.
I am confused. We were speak
* David Megginson -- Friday 12 March 2004 16:21:
> > All needles are OK. The only bug that I see is the non-transparent
> > attitude 'needle': http://members.aon.at/mfranz/pa28.jpg
>
> Yes -- I have that problem as well -- it has something to do with drawing order.
No. plib has a bug: it doesn't
* Melchior FRANZ -- Friday 12 March 2004 15:59:
> All needles are OK. The only bug that I see is the non-transparent
> attitude 'needle': http://members.aon.at/mfranz/pa28.jpg
> The SGI image seems to be OK, though (and I'm an SGI image expert :-).
> I'll look into plib ...
Yep, looks very much li
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
All needles are OK. The only bug that I see is the non-transparent
attitude 'needle': http://members.aon.at/mfranz/pa28.jpg
Yes -- I have that problem as well -- it has something to do with drawing order.
All the best,
David
___
David Megginson wrote:
> Frederic BOUVIER wrote:
>
> > I don't know for the original bug reporter, but I am using Windows and NVIDIA
> > if it is of any importance.
>
> That could matter -- I'm using Linux and NVIDIA. Do you have trouble with
> transparencies anywhere else? Do other people usi
* David Megginson -- Friday 12 March 2004 15:29:
> That's interesting -- is anyone else seeing this problem?
All needles are OK. The only bug that I see is the non-transparent
attitude 'needle': http://members.aon.at/mfranz/pa28.jpg
The SGI image seems to be OK, though (and I'm an SGI image expert
Frederic BOUVIER wrote:
I don't know for the original bug reporter, but I am using Windows and NVIDIA
if it is of any importance.
That could matter -- I'm using Linux and NVIDIA. Do you have trouble with
transparencies anywhere else? Do other people using Windows and NVIDIA see
a white rectan
David Megginson wrote:
> Frederic Bouvier wrote:
>
> >>Was this in PLIB 1.6, again? The alpha transparency is fine using the CVS
>
> > I am using the CVS plib and I am seeing this bug.
>
> That's interesting -- is anyone else seeing this problem?
I don't know for the original bug reporter, but
David Megginson wrote:
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Was this in PLIB 1.6, again? The alpha transparency is fine using
the CVS
I am using the CVS plib and I am seeing this bug.
That's interesting -- is anyone else seeing this problem?
No, not for IRIX, not for Linux.
Erik
___
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Was this in PLIB 1.6, again? The alpha transparency is fine using the CVS
I am using the CVS plib and I am seeing this bug.
That's interesting -- is anyone else seeing this problem?
All the best,
David
___
Flightgear-devel ma
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:07:10 -0500, David Megginson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Was this in PLIB 1.6, again? The alpha transparency is fine using the
CVS plib.
I'm pretty sure it was CVS plib.
--
Roy Vegard Ovesen
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EM
David Megginson wrote:
> Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
>
> > Another thing that I noticed about the pa28 panel was the plane in the
> > TC was not transparent where it should be. The rgb file did have an
> > alpha channel but because the file was only 256 colors the alpha channel
> > was not transparen
Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
I too, experienced this, no needles in the instruments. I use a NVidia
card under Cygwin. After installing the cvs version of plib, the needles
appeared (I used to have plib 1.6.0).
Ah, yes -- the last official PLIB version has a bug (I can hardly consider
it a feature)
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, David Megginson wrote:
> I used geometry for the needles, and they must just be too narrow to show
> up. It's strange, because I also use Linux+NVIDIA (GeForce2Go), and the
> needles do show up on my system at 1600x1200.
>
> In any case, I'll be switching to bigger quads with
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:10:30 +, David Luff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
One bug though - I don't see the instrument needles under Linux with an
NVidia card. I thought you simply hadn't done them, until I saw them
under Cygwin with an ATI card. I see the large tilting plane in the
turn co-o
David Luff wrote:
I'll second that - it really is good. It looks really good, and at high
resolutions the frame rate is much better than the default - I've seen 60
(pa28) vs. 30 (c172) at some locations and resolutions.
The old (2D) panel code seemed to be the real killer, since I'm using much
m
Martin Spott writes:
> David Megginson wrote:
> > Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/pa28-161/Models
> > In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv6690/Aircraft/pa28-161/Models
>
> > Modified Files:
> > pa28-161.ac panel.rgb
> > Added Files:
> > bench-back.rgb glareshield.rgb
> > Log
Martin Spott wrote:
This aircraft gets really nice.
Thanks. The big breakthrough was my finally learning to use Blender to make
the textures (such as the panel plastics and screws) as well as the geometry
-- using a good 3D modeller with a bit of lighting can make even a
ham-fisted dolt like m
David Megginson wrote:
> Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/pa28-161/Models
> In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv6690/Aircraft/pa28-161/Models
> Modified Files:
> pa28-161.ac panel.rgb
> Added Files:
> bench-back.rgb glareshield.rgb
> Log Message:
> Added textures for the b
-0.7
That should do the trick :)
David Megginson wrote:
Jim Wilson wrote:
Actually, it isn't that. It is just the location that the "camera"
points to.
You don't want it pointing at the nose. So add the entry below to the
external views in your xml wrapper that track the plane. The val
Jim Wilson wrote:
I wonder if we can model the broken air vent door on the pilot's side that
blows -35 degC air on my feet when I'm flying in the winter.
It's already there (parameter: --frostbite=mins where mins is number of
minutes before you lose your toes). With that all you need is an old
a
David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I wonder if we can model the broken air vent door on the pilot's side that
> blows -35 degC air on my feet when I'm flying in the winter.
It's already there (parameter: --frostbite=mins where mins is number of
minutes before you lose your toes). With
David Megginson wrote:
Thanks -- that did the trick. The plane is actually flying well, and
I'm starting to feel tempted to go back and do more work to make it a
fully-usable alternative to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]@#na 172 -- after all, it would be
nice for users to be able to fly a light single w
Jim Wilson wrote:
Actually, it isn't that. It is just the location that the "camera" points to.
You don't want it pointing at the nose. So add the entry below to the
external views in your xml wrapper that track the plane. The value is the
distance in meters from the FDM reference point (the n
David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Martin Spott wrote:
>
> > Hello David, I like your PA-28 very much, but I can't resist to note
> > that there is one 'feature' that is really annoying (I must admit that
> > this word is a bit too strong in this context !):
> > At least in the outside v
> > Hello David, I like your PA-28 very much, but I can't resist to note
> > that there is one 'feature' that is really annoying (I must admit that
> > this word is a bit too strong in this context !):
> > At least in the outside views the aircraft rotate around its nose.
> > It's difficult to tell
Martin Spott wrote:
Hello David, I like your PA-28 very much, but I can't resist to note
that there is one 'feature' that is really annoying (I must admit that
this word is a bit too strong in this context !):
At least in the outside views the aircraft rotate around its nose.
It's difficult to tel
David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/pa28-161/Models
> In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv27479
> Modified Files:
> pa28-161.ac
> Added Files:
> pa28-161-01.rgb panel-tex01.rgb panel-tex02.rgb
> panel-tex03.rgb panel.rgb
> L
33 matches
Mail list logo