RE: [Flightgear-devel] Change in Canonical Build Proceedure ???

2001-12-31 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Norman Vine writes: Erik Hofman writes: Norman Vine wrote: I have been fighting this one for 'awhile' with no success therefore my reccomendation for AC_PREREQ(2.13) It is probably a shell syntax mistake or somesuch :-( although this could be a cascade from autoconf failing

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Change in Canonical Build Proceedure ???

2001-12-29 Thread Erik Hofman
Norman Vine wrote: I have been fighting this one for 'awhile' with no success therefore my reccomendation for AC_PREREQ(2.13) It is probably a shell syntax mistake or somesuch :-( although this could be a cascade from autoconf failing with configure.in: 145: error: possibly undefined

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Change in Canonical Build Proceedure ???

2001-12-29 Thread Norman Vine
Erik Hofman writes: Norman Vine wrote: I have been fighting this one for 'awhile' with no success therefore my reccomendation for AC_PREREQ(2.13) It is probably a shell syntax mistake or somesuch :-( although this could be a cascade from autoconf failing with configure.in: 145: error:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Change in Canonical Build Proceedure ???

2001-12-28 Thread Bernie Bright
Norman Vine wrote: It appears as if recent changes in the CVS requires a modification in the steps for building FGFS 1) for now, with Cygwin at least, you NEED to add AC_PREREQ(2.13) as the first REAL LINE in configure.in I am investigating this as it shouldn't be necessary 2)

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Change in Canonical Build Proceedure ???

2001-12-28 Thread Norman Vine
Curtis L. Olson writes: Norman Vine writes: It appears as if recent changes in the CVS requires a modification in the steps for building FGFS 1) for now, with Cygwin at least, you NEED to add AC_PREREQ(2.13) as the first REAL LINE in configure.in I am investigating this as it