Hi,
first I want to say that there's nothing personal in this 'case'. And I
don't care too much if it's my code or David's code (or both) that
'survive' at the end.
I've written WeatherCM in an attempt to learn the ++ of the C++ and
thus it did it's job for me.
But what puzzels me is the
Christian Mayer writes:
The rest of FlightGear won't have
to know about that -- all it has to know is how to get an environment
object:
const FGEnvironment * env = globals.get_env_mgr()-getEnv(lat, lon, alt);
FGPhysicalProperty wdbpos = WeatherDatabase-get(position);
David wrote:
3. Concentrate on JSBSim and YASim for the FDM integration at first.
I still think sailing planes need a good weather database the most.
While JSBSim and YASim may be the best flight models we have
generally, AFAIK neither JSBSim nor YASim has a sailing plane (in the
works).
All
Jon wrote:
There is one in the works for JSBSim, at least
Ah - excellent news!
Jon
Bye bye,
Wolfram.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, David Megginson wrote:
Christian -- I'm developing my own weather DB in a separate stream
(--with-new-environment) partly to give you and others a chance to
integrate your code. If you can tie it in to the rest of FlightGear
(including the FDMs), I'll happily stop my
