Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear Review (was: Which aircraft to include in v0.9.9?)

> If someone needs translation into another language, you might try to > translate the web page using google translation. www.google.com/language_tools?hl=en> > > The english language version is here: > > user.de%2Fausgabe%2F2005%2

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear Review (was: Which aircraft to include in v0.9.9?)

On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 16:13 +0100, Thomas Förster wrote: > A slightly outdated version of FlightGear is installed for Suse via > Yast and via Apt for Debian. For the newest release you have to > compile the source code yourself [1]. For Mandrake 10.2, Fedora Core 3 > and the newest version 5.10 of

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear Review (was: Which aircraft to include in v0.9.9?)

Maybe some German-speaking user could point the reporters to Atlas for the moving map solution they describe as absent (and to the new Pigeon's map!) V. ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailma

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear Review (was: Which aircraft to include in v0.9.9?)

Am Samstag 12 November 2005 02:05 schrieb George Patterson: > On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 16:13 +0100, Thomas Förster wrote: > > A slightly outdated version of FlightGear is installed for Suse via > > Yast and via Apt for Debian. For the newest release you have to > > compile the source code yourself [1]