Re: [Flightgear-devel] I just crashed FlightGear using a dialog definition file / Nasal

2004-07-18 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Boris Koenig Frederic Bouvier wrote: Combo arrows are 16 pixels wide, so the input is -6 pixels . ( The width is not in characters but in pixels ) thanks for the explanation, but I was aware of that. And NO, this problem did not only occur with a width specification of = 16, but rather =

Re: [Flightgear-devel] I just crashed FlightGear using a dialog definition file / Nasal

2004-07-18 Thread Andy Ross
Boris Koenig wrote: There seem to be some issues regarding the XML file processing and FlightGear's stability: #Nasal parse error: empty subexpression in command, line 3 #Failed to execute command nasal #Segmentation fault The XML you posted contains no Nasal script, so I'm at a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] I just crashed FlightGear using a dialog definition file / Nasal

2004-07-18 Thread Boris Koenig
Andy Ross wrote: Boris Koenig wrote: There seem to be some issues regarding the XML file processing and FlightGear's stability: #Nasal parse error: empty subexpression in command, line 3 #Failed to execute command nasal #Segmentation fault The XML you posted contains no Nasal script,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] I just crashed FlightGear using a dialog definition file / Nasal

2004-07-18 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Boris Koenig wrote: Frederic Bouvier wrote: In fact, the combo's arrow is 16 pixels wide and an input must be at least 15 pixels. That means that every combo that are 31 pixels or less are causing a segfault in a function named chop_to_width in puInput.cxx. okay, makes sense - even

[Flightgear-devel] I just crashed FlightGear using a dialog definition file / Nasal

2004-07-17 Thread Boris Koenig
There seem to be some issues regarding the XML file processing and FlightGear's stability: # Nasal parse error: empty subexpression in command, line 3 # Failed to execute command nasal # Segmentation fault One problem seems to be related to using combo boxes with insufficient