On November 11, 2005 07:26 pm, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
> I am also getting GLXUnsupportedPrivateRequest error. This is so darn
> annoying!
>
> I used to be able to get around this problem by migrating back to XFree, or
> failing that, start XServer under 16-bit depth. Now, I can't go with
> ei
I am also getting GLXUnsupportedPrivateRequest error. This is so darn
annoying!
I used to be able to get around this problem by migrating back to XFree, or
failing that, start XServer under 16-bit depth. Now, I can't go with either
option: Debian has moved onto Xorg, and SDL doesn't allow me
On Monday 07 November 2005 12:05, Martin Spott wrote:
> You should have a closer look at the upcoming XOrg-6.9/7.0 that'll
> contain OpenSource drivers for the ATI Radeon X8x0 series.
Good news indeed - I knew there were OS drivers for ATI cards in exisistance,
but hadn't heard too much about thei
AJ MacLeod wrote:
> I really don't like closed source anything, and device drivers in particular,
> but IME nvidia's offerings are about as good as could be hoped for in the
> circumstances (although obviously not perfect.)
>
> I'd switch allegiance in a flash if well performing, stable, open s
On Sunday 06 November 2005 14:47, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> But looking at those problems with ATIs closed source drivers, I must say
> that NVidia seems to work better.
Certainly I've stuck with nvidia for all jobs involving graphics ever since
Matrox fell behind, and I've not had reason to regr
On Donnerstag 03 November 2005 22:28, Josh Babcock wrote:
> Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> > Now using fglrx with a newer radeon on that machine. Since that it works
> > fine ...
>
> Hmm, after much pain and suffering I have installed fglrx on my machine.
> Good news: all my OpenGL apps work fine. Bad n
Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
>
> Now using fglrx with a newer radeon on that machine. Since that it works
> fine ...
>
Hmm, after much pain and suffering I have installed fglrx on my machine.
Good news: all my OpenGL apps work fine. Bad news: except FlightGear.
It just falls back to software render
On Freitag 28 Oktober 2005 22:32, Josh Babcock wrote:
> >>X Error of failed request: GLXUnsupportedPrivateRequest
> >> Major opcode of failed request: 145 (GLX)
> >> Minor opcode of failed request: 16 (X_GLXVendorPrivate)
> >> Serial number of failed request: 31
> >> Current serial number i
Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> Josh,
>
> this is what I got with the r200 driver too.
> I believe it is a problem either in the glx implementation or the dri
> equivatent of that.
> May be a gl client lib not fitting exactly together with the server side
> implementation. Long standing bug. If you ge
Josh,
this is what I got with the r200 driver too.
I believe it is a problem either in the glx implementation or the dri
equivatent of that.
May be a gl client lib not fitting exactly together with the server side
implementation. Long standing bug. If you get that isolated you may report
that
OK, I got cvs to compile, but it won't run. Here's the output with
export LIBGL_VERBOSE=1
export LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose
tower:~$ fgfs --aircraft=c172p
libGL: XF86DRIGetClientDriverName: 4.0.1 r200 (screen 0)
libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/r200_dri.so
drmOpenByBusid: Searching f
11 matches
Mail list logo
