Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question on tuesday's preferences.xml update

2003-04-02 Thread Erik Hofman
Jim Wilson wrote: The magnetos are now defaulted to position 2 (Left) instead of 0 (Off). Was that intentional? Is there anything else in global preferences not mentioned in the log? I think the magnetos have been in position 2 for a while. This leaves the plane running at startup, which will

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question on tuesday's preferences.xml update

2003-04-02 Thread David Luff
On 4/2/03 at 10:04 AM Erik Hofman wrote: Jim Wilson wrote: The magnetos are now defaulted to position 2 (Left) instead of 0 (Off). Was that intentional? Is there anything else in global preferences not mentioned in the log? I think the magnetos have been in position 2 for a while. This

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question on tuesday's preferences.xml update

2003-04-02 Thread Jim Wilson
David Luff [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On 4/2/03 at 10:04 AM Erik Hofman wrote: Jim Wilson wrote: The magnetos are now defaulted to position 2 (Left) instead of 0 (Off). Was that intentional? Is there anything else in global preferences not mentioned in the log? I think the

re: [Flightgear-devel] Question on tuesday's preferences.xml update

2003-04-02 Thread David Megginson
Jim Wilson writes: The magnetos are now defaulted to position 2 (Left) instead of 0 (Off). Was that intentional? Is there anything else in global preferences not mentioned in the log? Is that not where they used to be? If not, we can put them back. All the best, David -- David

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question on tuesday's preferences.xml update

2003-04-02 Thread David Megginson
Jim Wilson writes: No, they were at 0, which is what makes sense. Ah -- they must have been set to 2 in the individual aircraft config files, then. All the best, David -- David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/ ___

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question on tuesday's preferences.xml update

2003-04-02 Thread Jim Wilson
Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Jim Wilson wrote: The magnetos are now defaulted to position 2 (Left) instead of 0 (Off). Was that intentional? Is there anything else in global preferences not mentioned in the log? I think the magnetos have been in position 2 for a while. This

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question on tuesday's preferences.xml update

2003-04-02 Thread Jim Wilson
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Jim Wilson writes: No, they were at 0, which is what makes sense. Ah -- they must have been set to 2 in the individual aircraft config files, then. He he...this is what happens when you start a reply to a mailing list and then finish it 30

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question on tuesday's preferences.xml update

2003-04-02 Thread David Megginson
Jim Wilson writes: On question though, should they have been set to 3? Yes, they should -- I was a little confused about the whole thing (that's the problem with using integers rather than string tokens). I have no problem putting them back to 0 in preferences.xml, if that's the way they were

[Flightgear-devel] Question on tuesday's preferences.xml update

2003-04-01 Thread Jim Wilson
The magnetos are now defaulted to position 2 (Left) instead of 0 (Off). Was that intentional? Is there anything else in global preferences not mentioned in the log? Best, Jim ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]