[Flightgear-devel] Question on tuesday's preferences.xml update

2003-04-01 Thread Jim Wilson
The magnetos are now defaulted to position 2 (Left) instead of 0 (Off). Was that intentional? Is there anything else in global preferences not mentioned in the log? Best, Jim ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgea

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question on tuesday's preferences.xml update

2003-04-02 Thread Erik Hofman
Jim Wilson wrote: The magnetos are now defaulted to position 2 (Left) instead of 0 (Off). Was that intentional? Is there anything else in global preferences not mentioned in the log? I think the magnetos have been in position 2 for a while. This leaves the plane running at startup, which will ma

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question on tuesday's preferences.xml update

2003-04-02 Thread David Luff
On 4/2/03 at 10:04 AM Erik Hofman wrote: >Jim Wilson wrote: >> The magnetos are now defaulted to position 2 (Left) instead of 0 (Off). >Was >> that intentional? Is there anything else in global preferences not >mentioned >> in the log? > >I think the magnetos have been in position 2 for a while

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question on tuesday's preferences.xml update

2003-04-02 Thread Jim Wilson
David Luff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > On 4/2/03 at 10:04 AM Erik Hofman wrote: > > >Jim Wilson wrote: > >> The magnetos are now defaulted to position 2 (Left) instead of 0 (Off). > >Was > >> that intentional? Is there anything else in global preferences not > >mentioned > >> in the log? > >

re: [Flightgear-devel] Question on tuesday's preferences.xml update

2003-04-02 Thread David Megginson
Jim Wilson writes: > The magnetos are now defaulted to position 2 (Left) instead of 0 > (Off). Was that intentional? Is there anything else in global > preferences not mentioned in the log? Is that not where they used to be? If not, we can put them back. All the best, David -- David M

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question on tuesday's preferences.xml update

2003-04-02 Thread David Megginson
Jim Wilson writes: > No, they were at 0, which is what makes sense. Ah -- they must have been set to 2 in the individual aircraft config files, then. All the best, David -- David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/ ___ Flight

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question on tuesday's preferences.xml update

2003-04-02 Thread Jim Wilson
Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Jim Wilson wrote: > > The magnetos are now defaulted to position 2 (Left) instead of 0 (Off). Was > > that intentional? Is there anything else in global preferences not mentioned > > in the log? > > I think the magnetos have been in position 2 for a while

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question on tuesday's preferences.xml update

2003-04-02 Thread Jim Wilson
David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Jim Wilson writes: > > > No, they were at 0, which is what makes sense. > > Ah -- they must have been set to 2 in the individual aircraft config > files, then. > He he...this is what happens when you start a reply to a mailing list and then finish i

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question on tuesday's preferences.xml update

2003-04-02 Thread David Megginson
Jim Wilson writes: > On question though, should they have been set to 3? Yes, they should -- I was a little confused about the whole thing (that's the problem with using integers rather than string tokens). I have no problem putting them back to 0 in preferences.xml, if that's the way they were