> JSBSim.cxx also instantiates an instance of FGFDMExec, and calls the Run()
> method periodically as directed by FlightGear, but it also copies
important
> data between JSBSim and FGFS.
>
> > and changes to the other .cpp and .h files are picked up by the
> > respective makefiles when building f
On Wednesday 28 November 2001 04:45 pm, you wrote:
> > So then, to migrate changes in JSBSim.cpp to JSBSim.cxx is a manual
> > process??
>
> This is not something one would normally do. JSBSim.cpp is sort of a
> "driver" program that initializes an instance of FGFDMExec and then reads a
> script o
> So then, to migrate changes in JSBSim.cpp to JSBSim.cxx is a manual
> process??
This is not something one would normally do. JSBSim.cpp is sort of a
"driver" program that initializes an instance of FGFDMExec and then reads a
script or an initialization file and just runs (calls a FGFDMExec::Run
> Sorry :-)
No problem, it was kind of a weird evening from the start.. plus had a disc
failure the day before and I don't think my backup was fully in sync with a
few of the files I could retrieve.
>
Looking back through all the source in .cpp and .cxx the diff is clearer
with the new underst
Sorry :-)
JSBSim.cxx is the interface (a.k.a. "The Bus") that acts as the conduit for
data trasnfer between JSBSim and FlightGear. It is not used in teh
standalone version of JSBSim. JSBSim.cpp is the driver program that
instantiates and runs JSBSim standalone. It is not used with FlightGear.
Jo
>
> This file is the interface between flightgear and JSBSim so it is used
> only when compiling flightgear and JSBSim together. It can be
> directly affected changes in JSBsim and directly affected by changes
> in FlightGear so which side should own the official master copy has
> been lightly d
> In the past, we've talked about removing JSBSim.cxx from the JSBSim
> distro completely, especially since it cannot be compiled there (much
> less tested).
Yep. Right now we are in sort of a Mexican standoff situation. JSBSim.cxx
exists only to support JSBSim. However, JSBSim.cxx is not compile
Ross Golder writes:
> OK, that certainly makes things easier. Here's an updated top-level
> Makefile.am.
>
> BTW, you can rename without losing history. You just have to move the
> RCS file in the CVS repository.
SourceForge
> And if theres no need to even *look* at anything with a .cxx
> exten
BERNDT, JON S. (JON) (JSC-EX) (LM) writes:
> > Also, automake is getting confused between JSBSim.cpp (which contains
> > main()), and JSBSim.cxx (the FDM interface). At link time, it creates
> > the JSBSim.o, then overwrites it when it compiles the next one. Could
> > one or other of these fi
On Wed, 2001-11-28 at 21:46, BERNDT, JON S. (JON) (JSC-EX) (LM) wrote:
> > Also, automake is getting confused between JSBSim.cpp (which contains
> > main()), and JSBSim.cxx (the FDM interface). At link time, it creates
> > the JSBSim.o, then overwrites it when it compiles the next one. Could
> > o
> Also, automake is getting confused between JSBSim.cpp (which contains
> main()), and JSBSim.cxx (the FDM interface). At link time, it creates
> the JSBSim.o, then overwrites it when it compiles the next one. Could
> one or other of these files be renamed for clarity?
No chance. First (but not t
On Wed, 2001-11-28 at 21:20, BERNDT, JON S. (JON) (JSC-EX) (LM) wrote:
> > > contributions are just being ignored (my improved cp2fg script still
> > > hasn't made it into CVS yet!!!).
>
> Yes, it has.
>
Sorry, you're right, it has. My bad.
Thanks for committing the Makefile.linux, and here's
> OK. Started with a fresh JSBSim checkout. The Makefile.linux is pretty
> out-of-date, and basically, broken. The attached patch gets things
> moving a bit further, but basically, I don't think this system is
> anywhere near as flexible as automake, so I'll be
> concentrating on that
> from now
> > contributions are just being ignored (my improved cp2fg script still
> > hasn't made it into CVS yet!!!).
Yes, it has.
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
OK, blonde moment.
--
Ross
On Wed, 2001-11-28 at 21:09, Ross Golder wrote:
> On Mon, 2001-11-26 at 17:51, Ross Golder wrote:
> > I'm just making sure the Makefile.linux system works, then I'll get back
> > onto the GNU auto* stuff, as long as everyone's happy that it'll be
> > wanted.
> >
>
>
On Mon, 2001-11-26 at 17:51, Ross Golder wrote:
> I'm just making sure the Makefile.linux system works, then I'll get back
> onto the GNU auto* stuff, as long as everyone's happy that it'll be
> wanted.
>
OK. Started with a fresh JSBSim checkout. The Makefile.linux is pretty
out-of-date, and bas
On Wed, 2001-10-31 at 18:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Would you like me to send you the files to commit, or shall I commit
> > myself?
>
> Send them.
>
Hi Jon,
I've found some time to have a have another bash at getting my
FlightGear CVS stuff working again. I updated my CVS w/d to see w
17 matches
Mail list logo
