Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
For FlightGear and X-Plane. There may be problems working with Microsoft's
Flight Simulator as it uses a different airport database than us.
X-Plane is meanwhile supported by a customized version of squawkbox -
implemented via some kind of plugin ... So: X-Plane
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..what do we have right now? FG can be rigged to run as
an ATC World Server now, right?
lol, I don't even know about that :-)
another evidence for the lack of documentation about FG :-/
We have xatc as a viable client to that FG ATC World Server,
I haven't yet really played
On Saturday 25 September 2004 20:38, Boris Koenig wrote:
The major disadvantage would of course be that there's no
integration with existing virtual ATC networks - so,
there wouldn't be any existing ATC community to really
'drive' such a FlightGear ATC project ... and even if you
could
For FlightGear and X-Plane. There may be problems working with Microsoft's
Flight Simulator as it uses a different airport database than us.
Ampere
On September 25, 2004 04:55 pm, Oliver C. wrote:
And this would be to create our own full open source ATC network
that is capable to speak to
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 17:28:20 -0400, Ampere wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On September 25, 2004 04:55 pm, Oliver C. wrote:
And this would be to create our own full open source ATC network
that is capable to speak to FlightGear and X-Plane and Microsoft's
Flight Simulator.
For
