Re: ..yawed OpenGL on 8 MB ATI mach64, was: [Flightgear-devel] Re: framerate

2002-04-03 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 00:41:26 +0200 (CEST), Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: From: Alex Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't know whether the IIC has the Pro feature set (suspect not). If it does, the Mach64 driver of Utah-GLX works fine for me. You might

Re: ..yawed OpenGL on 8 MB ATI mach64, was: [Flightgear-devel] Re: framerate

2002-04-03 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 15:03:17 -0800 (PST), Alex Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 00:41:26 +0200 (CEST), Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: From: Alex Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't know whether

Re: ..yawed OpenGL on 8 MB ATI mach64, was: [Flightgear-devel] Re: framerate

2002-04-02 Thread Martin Spott
From: Alex Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't know whether the IIC has the Pro feature set (suspect not). If it does, the Mach64 driver of Utah-GLX works fine for me. You might want to have a look at recent DRI development. I'm following this already for a while and it appears to me that the

..yawed OpenGL on 8 MB ATI mach64, was: [Flightgear-devel] Re: framerate 1/s

2002-03-22 Thread Arnt Karlsen
(This is also posted on usenet on comp.os.linux.x no.it.os.unix.linux.diverse) On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 23:37:46 +0100, Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: PS: Of course,I get better framerates up to 40/s (without clouds/panel) insome areas (above the sea