rg
>
> Hopefully they boot OKburning ISO #1 right now.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg Long
> Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 8:24 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Flightgear-devel] Redh
> I forgot to say that Debian must REALLY hide their ISO's - I had to get
> these from www.linuxiso.org
> Hopefully they boot OKburning ISO #1 right now.
That's because nobody pays them for the bandwidth. They'd rather you use
someone else's bandwidth, or borrow a CD from someone else, or bu
On Sun, 2002-03-17 at 09:22, David Megginson wrote:
> Greg Long writes:
>
> > I might go ahead and give Debian a shot on the install, seems like the
> > distro of choice, and I have a separate Redhat box (233mhz, don't think
> > its S3 Virge supports OpenGL, I'd have to look) but I could use t
Greg Long writes:
> I might go ahead and give Debian a shot on the install, seems like the
> distro of choice, and I have a separate Redhat box (233mhz, don't think
> its S3 Virge supports OpenGL, I'd have to look) but I could use that for
> testing Debian seems to be the choice by large, an
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Flightgear-devel] Redhat (vs debian) - DEBIAN ISO's
obtained
I might go ahead and give Debian a shot on the install, seems like the
distro of choice, and I have a separate Redhat box (233mhz, don't think
its S3 Virge supports OpenGL, I'd have to l
I might go ahead and give Debian a shot on the install, seems like the
distro of choice, and I have a separate Redhat box (233mhz, don't think
its S3 Virge supports OpenGL, I'd have to look) but I could use that for
testing Debian seems to be the choice by large, and if it supports
rpm's I might
