David Megginson writes:
>
> I agree that we need documentation, but no one has stepped forward and
> volunteered to write any. I disagree with Norm that all FlightGear
> development should stop until that documentation is written -- if we
> used that rule, we wouldn't have ATC, 3D cockpits, runw
Erez Boym writes:
> Well, I'm new to FlightGear tweaking, but I find it
> strange that to use flight gear (Add objects, add
> aircrafts etc.) you have to search the source files,
> just to find these xml properties that will enable me
> to do that work.
You can also examine the tree live in
I tried adding comments to the preferences.xml file, but they were not
rolled into CVS. The problem, and I believe why my edits didn't make
CVS, is that commenting each attribute causes diff to believe the
entire file has changed. This makes it difficult for those people who
have tailored .xm
Erez Boym wrote:
HI,
Well, I'm new to FlightGear tweaking, but I find it
strange that to use flight gear (Add objects, add
aircrafts etc.) you have to search the source files,
just to find these xml properties that will enable me
to do that work.
In my inexpert eyes it's something we must mainta
Norman Vine wrote:
David Megginson writes:
Martin Spott writes:
> > As far as I know, no one has started documenting the propperly, mainly
> > because they tend to change rather quickly.
>
> You probably hit the nail ;-)
Aside from that, there will probably be a major restructuring when we
David Megginson writes:
>
> Martin Spott writes:
>
> > > As far as I know, no one has started documenting the propperly, mainly
> > > because they tend to change rather quickly.
> >
> > You probably hit the nail ;-)
>
> Aside from that, there will probably be a major restructuring when we
Martin Spott writes:
> > As far as I know, no one has started documenting the propperly, mainly
> > because they tend to change rather quickly.
>
> You probably hit the nail ;-)
Aside from that, there will probably be a major restructuring when we
add multi-vehicle support.
All the best,
> As far as I know, no one has started documenting the propperly, mainly
> because they tend to change rather quickly.
You probably hit the nail ;-)
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
---
Erez Boym wrote:
Hi,
Did anyone start to document these properties in
another way, or do we have no documentation about
these xml properties ?
The documentation is scattered around a bit. Most of it lives in the
FlightGear source under FlightGear/docs-mini
But FDM speciffic propperties are (m
