-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Spott schrieb:
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
Although voice communication would be a great addition to FlightGear, it is
going to be pretty useless feature.
Could you probably back this with an explanation ? Voice-based ATC is
done all
Christian Mayer wrote:
Martin Spott schrieb:
Could you probably back this with an explanation ? Voice-based ATC is
done all over the world, why should'nt FlightGear do this as well ?
I understand the point that a real voice service does only make sense
when there is an ATC service (at
Hi all,
Yesterday I was thinking to try to model the
plane that Curt suggested but I think implementing a
voice ATC is much more pliable on my actual skills
good C/C++ researching the net for components/API
that can help me in achieving a scope integrating
the API/components
Erik Hofman wrote:
Maybe I can make another one with a different background image, so
everybody would be free to choose.
http://www.a1.nl/~ehofman/fgfs/gallery/fgfs-mousepad2006.jpg
http://www.a1.nl/~ehofman/fgfs/gallery/fgfs-mousepad2006c.jpg
Erik
Martin Spott wrote:
I'd like to underline these two points:
1.) There won't be any volunteer who is serious about doing ATC
service as long as FlightGear does not have _appropriate_
capabilities. Appropriate capabilities in my eyes includes
something that resembles the functions of
On Thursday 05 January 2006 15:45, Erik Hofman wrote:
http://www.a1.nl/~ehofman/fgfs/gallery/fgfs-mousepad2006c1.jpg
Now that one is fantastic, even though it doesn't show off any of our nice
military hardware ;-)
Cheers,
AJ
---
This
Oliver Schroeder wrote:
A RADAR station can be implemented as a listener to the server, so the
server
sends information of aircrafts to the radar just as to any other client.
Maybe I have to add some minor changes to the server code, but all in all it
should be pretty simple to create a
On Thursday 05 January 2006 01:54, Christian Mayer wrote:
The school works by simulating an instructor who speaks (via voice and
text) to the student. He first flys a lesson and then let the student
fly exactly the same commenting everything that goes well and that goes
bad.
That's exactly
That's exactly what I started doing but ...
Problem 1 (external app) :
Having the training session as a separate network app instead of being
integrated into FG is going to put off a lot of less technically minded
people.
It requires that the user first install Python + pyao + pyogg +
From: Erik Hofman
Sent: Thursday, 5. Jan 2006 10:45 -0500
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] New FlightGear mousepad
Erik Hofman wrote:
Maybe I can make another one with a different background image, so
everybody would be free to choose.
On Thursday 05 January 2006 14:55, Martin Spott wrote:
In other words (with a not that negative touch) this would say: We'd
appreciate if ATC/AI developers would keep such a scenario in mind when
they plan changes to this stuff.
You can't doubt that voice ATC is reality, not only in real life
This crash occurs quite frequently (/sim/ai-traffic/enabled=true):
#0 0x080be433 in FGTower::ProcessDownwindReport (this=0x1e31a800,
t=0x2153fc00) at AIPlane.hxx:80
#1 0x080beffc in FGTower::Respond (this=0x1e31a800) at tower.cxx:520
#2 0x080c2b5a in FGTower::Update (this=0x1e31a800,
Jean-Yves Lefort writes:
This crash occurs quite frequently (/sim/ai-traffic/enabled=true):
#0 0x080be433 in FGTower::ProcessDownwindReport (this=0x1e31a800,
t=0x2153fc00) at AIPlane.hxx:80
#1 0x080beffc in FGTower::Respond (this=0x1e31a800) at tower.cxx:520
#2 0x080c2b5a in
Hello Durk,
Durk Talsma wrote:
I still haven't firmly decided how ATC should interact with AI traffic, but
that these systems should be integrated has always been part of my
overarching design plan. Since my AI developments are based on extending the
AIModels code, this would naturally
Am Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2006 23:32 schrieb Martin Spott:
To me it's obvious why MP and AI are partially going to be merged some
day, because both are 'exterior' sources of aircraft movement from the
FlightGear users' point of view. If you think of integrating ATC with
AI as well, then please
On Thursday 05 January 2006 21:13, Durk Talsma wrote:
I haven't firmly
decided yet, but I'm considering starting to tackle airway following code,
which is in a way quite similar to the ground network.
Now that would be amazing. No other desktop sim has AI flying realistic
flightplans along
Martin Spott wrote:
Hello Durk,
Durk Talsma wrote:
I still haven't firmly decided how ATC should interact with AI traffic, but
that these systems should be integrated has always been part of my
overarching design plan. Since my AI developments are based on extending the
AIModels code,
On Thursday 05 January 2006 04:46 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Also, who ever is developing and working on the MP and AI code:
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE,
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE,
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE,
Curtis L. Olson writes:
Also, who ever is developing and working on the MP and AI code:
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE,
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE,
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE,
On January 5, 2006 04:10 am, Martin Spott wrote:
Could you probably back this with an explanation ? Voice-based ATC is
done all over the world, why should'nt FlightGear do this as well ?
Martin.
I'm not saying FlightGear shouldn't do this. I'm saying that this is going to
be a useless
20 matches
Mail list logo
