Re: [Flightgear-devel] material animation problem

2006-01-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:55:21PM -0500, Josh Babcock wrote: Can anyone see something wrong with this animation? It seems that the condition switch is stuck in the on position. You tell it to change the material if/when the condition is met. And that's what it does. You don't tell it to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Scenery 0.9.10 First Impressions

2006-01-19 Thread Martin Spott
Durk Talsma wrote: - The lake, river, and canal areas around the city of amsterdam are much improved: The North Sea canal, which connects amsterdam to the north sea is now accurately represented, as well as some artificial lakes surrounding the new flevoland area are now accurately

Re: [Flightgear-devel] material animation problem

2006-01-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 10:02:39AM +0100, Melchior FRANZ wrote: Solution: you have to change it back explicitly -- in a separate animation. Solution II: you can also watch the sun angle in a Nasal loop and set a property accordingly. Then you can leave the material condition away and use that

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data/Navaids

2006-01-19 Thread Martin Spott
Curtis L. Olson wrote: Sorry, I meant to and missed cvs committing it, should be committed now. Great, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! --

[Flightgear-devel] TCAS

2006-01-19 Thread Ben Clark
HeyI was wondering if anyone is currently working on implementation of a Traffic Collision Avoidance System. Unfortunately I currently an not competent enough with the FG code so I wouldn't like to try and tackle the programming part of such a system. But i'd easily be able to create some alert

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Scenery 0.9.10 First Impressions

2006-01-19 Thread Robicd
Curtis L. Olson wrote: Robicd wrote: My first impression is good. I see more details around my local area now. Thank you for the improvement. LICJ has no slopes on the runway anymore :-) LICP is still wrong positioned though, it's still 500m southern then the real position and that