Re: [Flightgear-devel] RFC: A new sun

2006-07-09 Thread Mark
Thank you! Yes, I agree the border looks somewhat displaced but this is actually because the fogcolor and the skydome don't match the sun (yet ;-). It's noticeable especially in the picture with the Citation or if the sun gets orange-red while the sky's blue and the fog is pinkish. If the sky/fo

Re: [Flightgear-devel] hud.hxx vs. HUD.hxx

2006-07-09 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Hi, > > The current layout > > breaks the VC8 Project files in current FG CVS quite heavily. > > > > #include vs. #include > > That's not a valid argument, as the files are to be included as > #include and . > No ambituity there. But I have no problem with your renaming > suggestion, if *all*

Re: [Flightgear-devel] RFC: A new sun

2006-07-09 Thread Vassilii Khachaturov
Beautiful. Thank you very much for doing this. The screens eluded gasps from my 2 elder sons watching over the shoulder; one even asked if it's a real photo or a FGFS capture - and said he was asking because the sun is usually much more dull in FG :-) (I was silent all the way and didn't introduce

Re: [Flightgear-devel] RFC: A new sun

2006-07-09 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Mark -- Sunday 09 July 2006 19:03: Looks beautiful, indeed. (Only the outer halo border is a bit too obvious. :-) > Right now i'm doing alot of calculations in the repaint-method that > deals with enviromental values, such as humidity, visibility and density. > This is necessary, since this

Re: [Flightgear-devel] RFC: A new sun

2006-07-09 Thread Jon S. Berndt
> Hello everybody, > > I've been experimenting with a redone implementation of the sun > in simgear. > My goal is to create a more acurate looking sun that also has more > variability in its appearance. > I'm pretty much done and like to ask for comments and advice. > > For those of you who'd l

[Flightgear-devel] RFC: A new sun

2006-07-09 Thread Mark
Hello everybody, I've been experimenting with a redone implementation of the sun in simgear. My goal is to create a more acurate looking sun that also has more variability in its appearance. I'm pretty much done and like to ask for comments and advice. For those of you who'd like to take a look

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Time initialization problem

2006-07-09 Thread Durk Talsma
On Saturday 01 July 2006 13:21, Durk Talsma wrote: > Considering that this function is called Init, I believe that the statement > on line 1413 is wrong. An init function should not carry over existing > values or the very variable it is supposed to initialize. Therefore, I'm > inclined to remove t