On 9/29/06, Ampere K. Hardraade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also I do not want this work, that I do
for entertainment, to be used for Real Life (TM) military purposes. The
latter is a moral position.
I simply avoid this moral position by not creating any military model. :)
*sigh*
seems
Hi Stuart,
Buchanan, Stuart wrote:
Some of you may have come across www.flightaware.com as a way to track IFR
flights. It uses data from the FAA radar system and provides products
(free and commercial) based on it.
I see one drawback here: They really only track flights in the coverage
of US
So I think I'll stick to Ampere's advice and release only civilian models...
Message du 04/10/06 à 09h22
De : Tony Pelton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A : FlightGear developers discussions
flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Copie à :
Objet : Re: [Flightgear-devel] 3D model for the F-15
On
I have some ideas about FlightGear
I think aircraft mounting will be a nice feature.
With the feature,we can mount space shuttle on airbusor missile on F-16.
Missile can be designed as an autopilot-aircraft,it explode(show fire and smoke, then vanish) as it touch anything after launching.
And
Hi Heiko,
interesting link.
I think I have to improve the rotor simulation to cover rotors with
different airfoils along the blade.
But first we need the drag/lift curves for these airfoils. My short
search at the web was not successful.
I am a little bit surprised, that the ec135 uses the same
Maik Justus wrote:
Hi Heiko,
interesting link.
I think I have to improve the rotor simulation to cover rotors with
different airfoils along the blade.
But first we need the drag/lift curves for these airfoils. My short
search at the web was not successful.
I am a little bit surprised,
--- Martin Spott wrote:
Hi Stuart,
Buchanan, Stuart wrote:
Some of you may have come across www.flightaware.com as a way to track
IFR
flights. It uses data from the FAA radar system and provides products
(free and commercial) based on it.
I see one drawback here: They really only
Andy Ross wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
Andy Ross wrote:
flying.toaster wrote:
Is there anywhere a list of work in progress just to avoid duplicates?
Even if there were, the best advice would be to ignore it. :)
Teamwork is not one of your favourites, is it !? ;-)
In
Buchanan, Stuart wrote:
Personally, I think the US approach of making all government data public
domain is one of their most endearing aspects.
I agree,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
Buchanan, Stuart wrote:
- Increase in texture resolution and improved textures. Now has a nice
blue pin-stripe down the side.
- Minor model improvements - pitot tube, wing struts, exhausts,
cowl-flaps, re-size of controls.
Available from http://www.nanjika.co.uk/flightgear/c182.tar.gz
10 matches
Mail list logo
