[Flightgear-devel] Push Back operations

2007-08-08 Thread Durk Talsma
Hi, For those among us not subscribed to the CVS log messages mailing list; I have just committed a rather large patch that provides some support for AI aircraft pushback operations at the beginning of the taxi stage. This code is designed around the new editing features that have appeared in

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Informal poll: driving simulation

2007-08-08 Thread Detlef Faber
Am Dienstag, den 07.08.2007, 23:40 +0200 schrieb Mirko Stanisak: I have just played a bit with Racer (http://www.racer.nl/) but it seems pretty nice. It is an open source, cross platform driving sim, much like FG. It seems to use some pretty reasonable physics and have the ability to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] MSVC8 link problem - Missing function in gnnode.cxx?

2007-08-08 Thread Durk Talsma
On Tuesday 07 August 2007 18:21, Geoff Air wrote: You can have unresolved items in a static library without complaint, provided it is never called from 'main' - that is the module is never extracted and added to the EXE by the linker ... FWIW, the code I referred to is now committed.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Severe Turbulence (Weather Interpolation Problem?)

2007-08-08 Thread Stuart Buchanan
Hi All, --- Hans Fugal wrote: I did some more investigating, and discovered that it is still happening even fair weather, it's just that the wind speed is low enough that the effect isn't very pronounced. Also, taxi up to a windsock and watch the effect. I'm very sorry you are seeing

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Severe Turbulence (Weather Interpolation Problem?)

2007-08-08 Thread Anders Gidenstam
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Stuart Buchanan wrote: I'd be very grateful if you could help me diagnose the problem, as I did quite a lot of testing, but didn't encounter this myself. One possibility is that my interpolation is fighting with something else trying to write to the weather properties.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fwd: Re: Bug in JSBSim FGPropeller.cpp

2007-08-08 Thread gh.robin
On Tue 7 August 2007 22:37, Berndt, Jon S wrote: Yes there is some differences needed to keep the right heading , when we modify the throttle value, but it is not exactly what you are describing. I haven't been able to look too closely at this, yet, but I have a suspicion. If you look in

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Severe Turbulence (Weather Interpolation Problem?)

2007-08-08 Thread Harald JOHNSEN
Hans Fugal wrote: Semantically, am I right that for weather scenarios, METAR is the real weather, Thunderstorm is thunderstorm-like weather (no relation to real weather?), fair is easy flying (again, no relation to real weather?), and none means no scenario (manual control?). That's what I think

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Severe Turbulence (Weather Interpolation Problem?)

2007-08-08 Thread Hans Fugal
On 8/8/07, Harald JOHNSEN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is right, except that in the 'none' scenario the weather is still updated by the metar if metar is enabled. I can not remember if this is a bug or a feature. If I may vote, I call it a bug. If there is no difference between none and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Push Back operations

2007-08-08 Thread Harald JOHNSEN
Durk Talsma wrote: Hi, For those among us not subscribed to the CVS log messages mailing list; I have just committed a rather large patch that provides some support for AI aircraft pushback operations at the beginning of the taxi stage. This code is designed around the new editing features

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Severe Turbulence (Weather Interpolation Problem?)

2007-08-08 Thread Hans Fugal
Hi Stuart, On 8/8/07, Stuart Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd be very grateful if you could help me diagnose the problem, as I did quite a lot of testing, but didn't encounter this myself. Happy to help. One possibility is that my interpolation is fighting with something else trying

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Push Back operations

2007-08-08 Thread SydSandy
On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 19:08:45 +0200 Harald JOHNSEN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Durk Talsma wrote: Hi, For those among us not subscribed to the CVS log messages mailing list; I have just committed a rather large patch that provides some support for AI aircraft pushback operations at the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Push Back operations

2007-08-08 Thread Durk Talsma
Hi Harald, On Wednesday 08 August 2007 19:08, Harald JOHNSEN wrote: Durk Talsma wrote: Hi, For those among us not subscribed to the CVS log messages mailing list; I have just committed a rather large patch that provides some support for AI aircraft pushback operations at the beginning of

[Flightgear-devel] Informal poll: driving simulation

2007-08-08 Thread Juergen Tretthahn
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 09:46:27PM -0500, Curtis Olson wrote: I'd like to do a quick informal poll here. My day job involves maintaining and managing an advanced research driving simulator: ... So I would be interested if there is anyone out there that would be especially interested in

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Severe Turbulence (Weather Interpolation Problem?)

2007-08-08 Thread Georg Vollnhals
Could you explain what you are seeing in terms of wind direction and strength? Is it: - oscillating in direction and/or speed - rotating continually? - chaotic? Are you seeing the problem generally, or only when the METAR changes as you fly from one zone to another? Generally,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Severe Turbulence (Weather Interpolation Problem?)

2007-08-08 Thread Georg Vollnhals
Sorry, my FIRST reply was sent unfinished by accident! Here is the right one :-) -- Due to the special weather conditions tonight (only IFR possible) the formerly described effect was