Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM bug: Call rejected by remote

Hi Arvid, On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 07:47:59PM +0100, AnMaster wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > So when will this be fixed. Considering the type of flights I normally make I > really need this feature. For example I was planning cross atlantic flight > with > in air r

Re: [Flightgear-devel] v1.0 Gallery Page

On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 01:33:52 +0100 AnMaster wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hm another issue: in S-51-on_carrier one of the aircrafts in the > background seems partly below deck? It's on an elevator, if I'm not mistaken. There's also another mid-deck elevator sha

Re: [Flightgear-devel] v1.0 Gallery Page

All, This picture could be redone with better filtering to show off mulit-player carrier operations. http://pics.ww.com/v/coulee182/fgfs-nimitz-multi-player.jpg.html Best Regards, Paul B. - Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yah

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autopilot filters upset after reloading autopilot

On Tuesday 18 December 2007 22:52, Tiago Gusmão wrote: > LeeE wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've noticed recently that after re-loading an autopilot the > > filters that are being used seem to be getting a bit > > 'confused'. I spotted it when I was comparing the unfiltered > > input with the filtere

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Training tool

Thanks John, As this will be running in Windows (could not convince the client to go Linux), I was going to use a GUI based interface. I was thinking C++ but am open to alternate suggestions. I am coming from the MSFS world and have not had a lot of time to explore FlightGear yet in great deta

Re: [Flightgear-devel] v1.0 Gallery Page

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 What about: http://rage.kuonet.org/~anmaster/flightgear/screenshots/1.0/Areostar-700-KSFO-05.png Regards, Arvid Norlander Curtis Olson wrote: > On Dec 18, 2007 7:09 PM, AnMaster <> wrote: >> Here are 3: >> >> http://rage.kuonet.org/~anmaster/flig

Re: [Flightgear-devel] v1.0 Gallery Page

On Dec 18, 2007 7:09 PM, AnMaster <> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Here are 3: > > http://rage.kuonet.org/~anmaster/flightgear/screenshots/1.0/Areostar-700-KSFO-02.png > > http:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] v1.0 Gallery Page

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Here are 3: http://rage.kuonet.org/~anmaster/flightgear/screenshots/1.0/Areostar-700-KSFO-02.png http://rage.kuonet.org/~anmaster/flightgear/screenshots/1.0/Areostar-700-KSFO-03.png http://rage.kuonet.org/~anmaster/flightgear/screenshots/1.0/Areostar

Re: [Flightgear-devel] v1.0 Gallery Page

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I'll see what I can do today or tomorrow. Regards, Arvid Norlander Curtis Olson wrote: > Ok, I'll remove that, but I'd be happy to add back in some other Aerostar > picture if it was submitted. > > Curt. > > > On Dec 18, 2007 6:26 PM, AnMaster

Re: [Flightgear-devel] v1.0 Gallery Page

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hm another issue: in S-51-on_carrier one of the aircrafts in the background seems partly below deck? Also I see jpeg artifacts even in the largest version, I would suggest that the full versions are either done in png or highest quality jpeg. Also

Re: [Flightgear-devel] v1.0 Gallery Page

Ok, I'll remove that, but I'd be happy to add back in some other Aerostar picture if it was submitted. Curt. On Dec 18, 2007 6:26 PM, AnMaster <> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > The Aerostar-700-KSFO-01 should not be included it shows some ILS thing in > the > wat

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Training tool

On 12/18/2007 06:04 PM, Shad Young wrote: > I have been contracted to help develop a > multi-seat training simulator in which the instructor can trigger > failures to individual users in a 25 seat to 1 instructor classroom. The > school in which I am developing this for would prefer to use

Re: [Flightgear-devel] v1.0 Gallery Page

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 The Aerostar-700-KSFO-01 should not be included it shows some ILS thing in the water, looks bad. Regards, Arvid Norlander Curtis Olson wrote: > Here is a prototype for the v1.0 Gallery: > > http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/tmp/v1.0/ > > I'v

Re: [Flightgear-devel] v1.0 Gallery Page

On Dec 18, 2007 5:21 PM, Maik Justus <> wrote: > Heikos page is now working for me with also some other screenshots > (worth to be in the gallerie, too): > http://www.hoerbird.net/index.htm Hi, right now I still cannot connect ... would someone who can connect be willing to pull the images and s

Re: [Flightgear-devel] v1.0 Gallery Page

Frederic Bouvier schrieb: > Selon Frederic Bouvier: > > >> Selon Curtis Olson: >> >> >>> Here is a prototype for the v1.0 Gallery: >>> >>> http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/tmp/v1.0/ >>> >>> I've taken the best of the pictures that were submitted on the mailing list >>> and organized an

Re: [Flightgear-devel] v1.0 Gallery Page

On mar 18 décembre 2007, Curtis Olson wrote: > Here is a prototype for the v1.0 Gallery: > > http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/tmp/v1.0/ > > I've taken the best of the pictures that were submitted on the mailing list > and organized and arranged them. > > Here are a few things that jump out at

Re: [Flightgear-devel] v1.0 Gallery Page

Hi AJ MacLeod schrieb am 18.12.2007 23:33: > On Tuesday 18 December 2007 22:15:24 Curtis Olson wrote: > > >> 4. Do we have a nice outside view of a glider or two? >> > > Heiko's ASK looks very nice though, and he has some very good screenshots of > it too - hopefully he will reappear with

Re: [Flightgear-devel] v1.0 Gallery Page

Hi James, James A. Treacy schrieb am 19.12.2007 00:02: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 04:15:24PM -0600, Curtis Olson wrote: > >> Here is a prototype for the v1.0 Gallery: >> >> http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/tmp/v1.0/ >> >> I've taken the best of the pictures that were submitted on the mailing

Re: [Flightgear-devel] v1.0 Gallery Page

Curt Olson wrote: >Here is a prototype for the v1.0 Gallery: > > > http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/tmp/v1.0/ > >I've taken the best of the pictures that were submitted on the mailing list >and organized and arranged them. > >Here are a few thing

Re: [Flightgear-devel] External Cargo, was: Re: screenshots (and "snapshots")

Hi Viviam, Vivian Meazza schrieb am 18.12.2007 23:41: > I've just a few moments ago added a few lines of code to AIBallistic which > apply an external force (using the same math as above). The rest works as > before. I just need few properties to set the magnitude and vector of the > external force

Re: [Flightgear-devel] v1.0 Gallery Page

Selon Frederic Bouvier: > Selon Curtis Olson: > > > Here is a prototype for the v1.0 Gallery: > > > > http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/tmp/v1.0/ > > > > I've taken the best of the pictures that were submitted on the mailing list > > and organized and arranged them. > > BTW, these shots are a

[Flightgear-devel] Training tool

Hi all, I am new to the list. I have been contracted to help develop a multi-seat training simulator in which the instructor can trigger failures to individual users in a 25 seat to 1 instructor classroom. The school in which I am developing this for would prefer to use FlightGear in that it i

Re: [Flightgear-devel] v1.0 Gallery Page

On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 04:15:24PM -0600, Curtis Olson wrote: > Here is a prototype for the v1.0 Gallery: > > http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/tmp/v1.0/ > > I've taken the best of the pictures that were submitted on the mailing list > and organized and arranged them. Very nice! I am curiou

Re: [Flightgear-devel] External Cargo, was: Re: screenshots (and "snapshots")

Vivian Meazza schrieb: > Maik Justus > > >> Sent: 18 December 2007 21:02 >> To: FlightGear developers discussions >> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] External Cargo,was: Re: >> screenshots (and "snapshots") >> >> >> Hi, >> Vivian Meazza schrieb am 18.12.2007 00:27: >> >>> Maik wrote >>> >>>

Re: [Flightgear-devel] v1.0 Gallery Page

Selon Curtis Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Here is a prototype for the v1.0 Gallery: > > http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/tmp/v1.0/ > > I've taken the best of the pictures that were submitted on the mailing list > and organized and arranged them. BTW, these shots are a bit old but I think the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autopilot filters upset after reloading autopilot

LeeE wrote: > Hi all, > > I've noticed recently that after re-loading an autopilot the filters > that are being used seem to be getting a bit 'confused'. I spotted > it when I was comparing the unfiltered input with the filtered > output and saw that the input was stable to 2 decimal places bu

Re: [Flightgear-devel] External Cargo, was: Re: screenshots (and "snapshots")

Maik Justus > Sent: 18 December 2007 21:02 > To: FlightGear developers discussions > Subject: [Flightgear-devel] External Cargo,was: Re: > screenshots (and "snapshots") > > > Hi, > Vivian Meazza schrieb am 18.12.2007 00:27: > > Maik wrote > > > >> Hi, > >> Melchior FRANZ schrieb am 17.12.20

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Pushback

Hi Gijs, Gijs de Rooy schrieb am 18.12.2007 22:09: > Hi folks, > > I did a lot of work last week on a pushback truck model. > The model is done, the steering is working (could be better) > but we still need the possibility to push/pull planes. > > Please see the forum page for some more info an

Re: [Flightgear-devel] v1.0 Gallery Page

On Tuesday 18 December 2007 22:15:24 Curtis Olson wrote: > Here is a prototype for the v1.0 Gallery: > http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/tmp/v1.0/ Well, I'd buy it :-) I'm amazed at the range and volume of models that we have (and the rate that they seem to be accumulating), many of them ver

[Flightgear-devel] v1.0 Gallery Page

Here is a prototype for the v1.0 Gallery: http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/tmp/v1.0/ I've taken the best of the pictures that were submitted on the mailing list and organized and arranged them. Here are a few things that jump out at me: 1. The big commercial jets with glass cockpits seem v

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft downloads page update

--- Curtis Olson wrote: > Hi, > > I have updated the aircraft downloads page with all the lastest versions of > the available (CVS) aircraft. Many of the new ones do not have a thumbnail > image for the web page, and a few of them have been copied from other > aircraft and are incorrect. It woul

[Flightgear-devel] Pushback

Hi folks, I did a lot of work last week on a pushback truck model. The model is done, the steering is working (could be better) but we still need the possibility to push/pull planes. Please see the forum page for some more info and screens and a download link: http://www.flightgear.org/forums/

[Flightgear-devel] External Cargo, was: Re: screenshots (and "snapshots")

Hi, Vivian Meazza schrieb am 18.12.2007 00:27: > Maik wrote > >> Hi, >> Melchior FRANZ schrieb am 17.12.2007 02:18: >> >>> * Georg Vollnhals -- Monday 17 December 2007: >>> >>> Just now (!!!) remembering Torsten's Dragonfly banner-trick (!!!) which is pretty similar: >

Re: [Flightgear-devel] screenshots (and "snapshots")

Heiko, I am trying to collect screen shots today, but I can't get through to your site or any of your links. If you'd like some of you images considered for the gallary page, please send them to me directly. Gerard, AJ, Torsten, and everyone else who'd posted pictures to this thread: I believe I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] MP chat BUGs

Csaba wrote: > On Dec 18, 2007 6:53 PM, AnMaster wrote: > > > > Much better would be getting the closest airport with a > matching > tower frequency > > than just using the nearest airport. > > Excellent idea, I second that. Unfortunately this is a limitation of the Nasal interface to the air

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM bug: Call rejected by remote

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 So when will this be fixed. Considering the type of flights I normally make I really need this feature. For example I was planning cross atlantic flight with in air refueling over mp using fgcom but until this BUG is fixed that is not possible. Becau

Re: [Flightgear-devel] MP chat BUGs

On Dec 18, 2007 6:53 PM, AnMaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Much better would be getting the closest airport with a matching tower > frequency > than just using the nearest airport. Excellent idea, I second that. -- Csaba/Jester

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM bug: Call rejected by remote

On Dec 18, 2007 5:36 PM, AnMaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > When I select a frequency that is not a tower freq for any nearby airport I > always get "Call rejected by remote". That is wrong, I should be able to use > any > frequency anywhere and talk to any aircraft within range. There is no

[Flightgear-devel] MP chat BUGs

getting the closest airport with a matching tower frequency than just using the nearest airport. Screenshot of the above mentioned approach: http://rage.kuonet.org/~anmaster/flightgear/screenshots/bugs/mp-chat-20071218/fgfs-screen-010.png As a result this function is unusable in areas with many

[Flightgear-devel] Bugs with recent CVS HEAD (osg)

=LSTZ See the screenshots: http://rage.kuonet.org/~anmaster/flightgear/screenshots/bugs/osg-head-20071218/fgfs-screen-063.png and http://rage.kuonet.org/~anmaster/flightgear/screenshots/bugs/osg-head-20071218/fgfs-screen-064.png Also about 10% of the times I start flightgear I end up starting

[Flightgear-devel] FGCOM bug: Call rejected by remote

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 When I select a frequency that is not a tower freq for any nearby airport I always get "Call rejected by remote". That is wrong, I should be able to use any frequency anywhere and talk to any aircraft within range. There is no airport out over the At

[Flightgear-devel] Rescue operation with S-51-Dragonfly

Hello, helicopter lover I just have added on the S-51 an animation of a rescue operation, this is the first step which must be followed by others more accurate (i hope). That animation is a separate part which is included in a specific directory "Rescue" (here Aircraft/S-51-Dragonfly/Mod

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft downloads page update

On Monday 17 December 2007 20:25, Curtis Olson wrote: > Hi, > > I have updated the aircraft downloads page with all the lastest > versions of the available (CVS) aircraft. Many of the new ones > do not have a thumbnail image for the web page, and a few of them > have been copied from other aircraf

[Flightgear-devel] Autopilot filters upset after reloading autopilot

Hi all, I've noticed recently that after re-loading an autopilot the filters that are being used seem to be getting a bit 'confused'. I spotted it when I was comparing the unfiltered input with the filtered output and saw that the input was stable to 2 decimal places but the filtered output s

Re: [Flightgear-devel] segfaults...

On Monday 17 December 2007 22:47, Georg Vollnhals wrote: > Tim Moore schrieb: > > Since we're talking about OSG now... this may be related to the > > pager changes I checked in over the weekend. Could you post > > some details on this problem of yours? > > > > Thanks, > > Tim > > Hi Tim, > > as no

[Flightgear-devel] Slackware package for FlightGear 1.0.0

The Slackware package for FlightGear 1.0.0 is now available from http://flightgear.stockill.org.uk/ Feedback from anyone using this package will be extremely welcome, as I'm currently 4500 miles from my development machine, and don't know when I'll be back. The program starts properly, but I'm una

[Flightgear-devel] Slackware package for FlightGear 1.0.0

The Slackware package for FlightGear 1.0.0 is now available from http://flightgear.stockill.org.uk/ Feedback from anyone using this package will be extremely welcome, as I'm currently 4500 miles from my development machine, and don't know when I'll be back. The program starts properly, but I'm una

[Flightgear-devel] Slackware package for FlightGear 1.0.0

The Slackware package for FlightGear 1.0.0 is now available from http://flightgear.stockill.org.uk/ Feedback from anyone using this package will be extremely welcome, as I'm currently 4500 miles from my development machine, and don't know when I'll be back. The program starts properly, but I'm una

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft downloads page update

Fabian Grodek wrote: > The download page contains other aircrafts with no 3D models: > 1. F-15 (NOT F-15C) > 2. Marchetti > 3. X-24B > 4. Shuttle > Their FDM are present. > I particularly like to have the FDM of these aircraft available, but, at > least for the JSBSim models (X24B and Shuttle), th

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft downloads page update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I agree, aircrafts without 3D models should not be included (apart from psedo-aircrafts like ATC and MIBS that aren't meant to have 3D models). Regards, Arvid Norlander Fabian Grodek wrote: > The download page contains other aircrafts with no 3D m

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft downloads page update

The download page contains other aircrafts with no 3D models: 1. F-15 (NOT F-15C) 2. Marchetti 3. X-24B 4. Shuttle Their FDM are present. I particularly like to have the FDM of these aircraft available, but, at least for the JSBSim models (X24B and Shuttle), they can be (and indeed are) are availab

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Release in progress

> I just finished creating the release and placed the tar files on my server. > Due to the capacity limitations of my own server, I'm not providing a > download link here. They will hopefully shortly be transfered to the > mirrors, shortly. I've also given the people involved in building the > wind

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft downloads page update

* Melchior FRANZ -- Tuesday 18 December 2007: [bell206/as350] > I've moved them to the Attic/ in CVS, but I assume they need to be > removed manually from the download page. Ah, I see that's already done. :-) BTW: * Maik Justus -- Monday 17 December 2007: > Melchior: Whats about changing the b

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft downloads page update

* Maik Justus -- Monday 17 December 2007: > could you please delete the as350 and the bell206 from the download > page? Both have no 3D-model and a very poor FDM. I've moved them to the Attic/ in CVS, but I assume they need to be removed manually from the download page. Once someone comes along