Re: [Flightgear-devel] FOV: Explanation?

On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 06:19 +, Heiko Schulz wrote: > Hi, > > I have a simple question, but I didn't find anywhere an answer: > > What exact expresses FOV in FlightGear: are the values meant > in degress or in a other special unit? > > How they are compared to focal length? > > Regards > HH

[Flightgear-devel] FOV: Explanation?

Hi, I have a simple question, but I didn't find anywhere an answer: What exact expresses FOV in FlightGear: are the values meant in degress or in a other special unit? How they are compared to focal length? Regards HHS still in work: http://www.hoerbird.net/galerie.html But already done: http

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Make the cross from marker.ac translucent

Hi Heiko, I did that in Blender, there I hav ea slider which I used? Can you tell me which value it is in th marker.ac to change the transparency? Regards Manfred Heiko Schulz schrieb: > Hi, > > Which value you used for the alpha transparency? > > Regards > HHS > > still in work: http://www.hoer

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Make the cross from marker.ac translucent

Hi, Which value you used for the alpha transparency? Regards HHS still in work: http://www.hoerbird.net/galerie.html But already done: http://www.hoerbird.net/reisen.html --- Manfred Janßen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am Mo, 1.9.2008: > Von: Manfred Janßen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Betreff: [Flig

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Make the cross from marker.ac translucent

Hi, Which value you used for the alpha transparency? Regards HHS still in work: http://www.hoerbird.net/galerie.html But already done: http://www.hoerbird.net/reisen.html --- Manfred Janßen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am Mo, 1.9.2008: > Von: Manfred Janßen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Betreff: [Flig

[Flightgear-devel] Make the cross from marker.ac translucent

Hi, I tried this: import the marker.ac into blender and changed the alpha and exported it as an ac-file.. In blender the view looks like I expected, but when using it in FlightGear, I saw nothing. I saw that the ac I created with blender is only 1kb (original 4kb) and I opened it in a editor and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [patch] Pointmasses for the Cessna 172P

This is a patch to the c172p-set to add pointmasses for all four occupant positions and baggage. We are extending the FlightGear weight and balance dialog for JSBSim and the pointmasses have to be defined. Index: c172p-set.xml === RCS

[Flightgear-devel] [patch] Pointmasses for the Cessna 172P

This is a patch to the c172p fdm to add pointmasses for all four occupant positions and baggage. The X locations were taken from the c172 type certificate 3A12 dated September 15, 1998. As the new pointmasses have a weight of 0 they will not affect the current model, however we are extending the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Patch: Minor bugfixes for MSVC compatibility

James Turner wrote: > On 31 Aug 2008, at 11:58, Stefan C. Müller wrote: > >> OK, here's the patch. >> But we need a total of 3 overloaded operator(). Not realy nice to >> look at. >> Anyway, I'm happy with both variants. > > As you say, not ideal, but I'm still working on this code, so a little

Re: [Flightgear-devel] f16 speedbrakes

On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 12:31 +0200, Fabian Grodek wrote: > On 8/30/08, Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ... But I don't see any pitching moment effect; from > > what I see in NASA TP 1538 > I > > understand there is a pitc

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Patch: Minor bugfixes for MSVC compatibility

Frederic Bouvier schrieb: Stefan C. Müller a écrit : * Replaced an rint() call with floor() (MSVC does not offer rint). I am a bit worried that floor and rint are not the same. I don't know if it matters in this context but how about using the code below instead ? // round double to 1

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bubble sextant model for FlightGear

On dim 31 août 2008, Anders Gidenstam wrote: > Hi all, > > My interest in obsolete technology and a bygone era have made me model a > RAF mk9 bubble sextant for FlightGear: > > http://www.gidenstam.org/FlightGear/Celestial_navigation_in_fgfs/fgfs-RAFmk >9-506.jpg > http://www.gidenstam.org/FlightGe

[Flightgear-devel] Bubble sextant model for FlightGear

Hi all, My interest in obsolete technology and a bygone era have made me model a RAF mk9 bubble sextant for FlightGear: http://www.gidenstam.org/FlightGear/Celestial_navigation_in_fgfs/fgfs-RAFmk9-506.jpg http://www.gidenstam.org/FlightGear/Celestial_navigation_in_fgfs/fgfs-RAFmk9-507.jpg It i

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Patch: Minor bugfixes for MSVC compatibility

Stefan C. Müller a écrit : > * Replaced an rint() call with floor() (MSVC does not offer rint). I am a bit worried that floor and rint are not the same. I don't know if it matters in this context but how about using the code below instead ? // round double to 10^g double rnd(double r, int g = 0)

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS log sleepy ?

On dim 31 août 2008, Alexis Bory - xiii wrote: > gerard robin wrote: > > Hello, > > > > the cvs log seems to be sleepy, since 25-08 > > > > Am i right? > > Or is it only on my mailing side ? > > > > Regards > > Salut Gerard, > > Nope, I actually receive plenty and fast CVS log messages. Could be on

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Patch: Minor bugfixes for MSVC compatibility

Frederic Bouvier a écrit : > Stefan C. Müller a écrit : > >> * Replaced an rint() call with floor() (MSVC does not offer rint). >> > > Are you sure you don't need > #include > ? > because rint is already used in Main/Options.cxx > Forget that. I missed the #ifdef HAVE_RINT around it -

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Patch: Minor bugfixes for MSVC compatibility

Stefan C. Müller a écrit : > * Replaced an rint() call with floor() (MSVC does not offer rint). Are you sure you don't need #include ? because rint is already used in Main/Options.cxx -Fred -- Frédéric Bouvier http://my.fotolia.com/frfoto/ Photo gallery http://fgsd.sourceforge.net/Flight

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS log sleepy ?

gerard robin wrote: > Hello, > > the cvs log seems to be sleepy, since 25-08 > > Am i right? > Or is it only on my mailing side ? > > Regards > Salut Gerard, Nope, I actually receive plenty and fast CVS log messages. Could be on your Mnt Ventoux sunny side :-) Alexis -

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Patch: Minor bugfixes for MSVC compatibility

On 31 Aug 2008, at 11:58, Stefan C. Müller wrote: > OK, here's the patch. > But we need a total of 3 overloaded operator(). Not realy nice to > look at. > Anyway, I'm happy with both variants. As you say, not ideal, but I'm still working on this code, so a little bit of uglyness, I can live

[Flightgear-devel] CVS log sleepy ?

Hello, the cvs log seems to be sleepy, since 25-08 Am i right? Or is it only on my mailing side ? Regards -- Gérard http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/ "J'ai décidé d'être heureux parce que c'est bon pour la santé. Voltaire "

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Patch: Minor bugfixes for MSVC compatibility

James Turner schrieb: Adding the commutative operator is fine with me, seems like the cleanest solution. OK, here's the patch. But we need a total of 3 overloaded operator(). Not realy nice to look at. Anyway, I'm happy with both variants. Stefan Index: Airports/simple.cxx

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Legacy #ifdefs

On 31 Aug 2008, at 08:49, Martin Spott wrote: > Without the slightest trouble - after applying a minor correction to > make the linker happy it even does on IRIX using MIPSpro. Either it's > not too difficult to get there or the guys at OSG simply have the > expertise about wiriting code to compi

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Patch: Minor bugfixes for MSVC compatibility

Frederic Bouvier schrieb: > As Stefan says, the ( debugging ) code expects the predicate is > commutative. Maybe there is a symbol to disable debugging code to be > generated, Ah, yes there is one way, but I forgot to mention. It's prossible to #define _HAS_INTERATOR_DEBUGGING 0 (default for rele

Re: [Flightgear-devel] f16 speedbrakes

On 8/30/08, Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ... But I don't see any pitching moment effect; from > > what I see in NASA TP 1538 I > > understand there is a pitch-down effect from the speedbrakes. > > > It looks like you don't have the latest version o

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Patch: Minor bugfixes for MSVC compatibility

On 31 Aug 2008, at 08:30, Frederic Bouvier wrote: > As Stefan says, the ( debugging ) code expects the predicate is > commutative. Maybe there is a symbol to disable debugging code to be > generated, or we could provide the class a second operator() : > > > bool operator()(const std::string& aB,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Legacy #ifdefs

James Turner wrote: > However, I think there's a bigger issue - FG now requires OSG, does > OSG build okay with SunStudio? Without the slightest trouble - after applying a minor correction to make the linker happy it even does on IRIX using MIPSpro. Either it's not too difficult to get there or

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Patch: Minor bugfixes for MSVC compatibility

James Turner a écrit : > On 30 Aug 2008, at 23:16, Stefan C. Müller wrote: > > >>> As far as I can tell, this is not true. The third parameter type is >>> independant from the type of the container, and should only match >>> the type of the second parameter of the predicate. The current code