On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 18:27 +0200, "Stefan C. Müller" wrote:
I'd like to thank Stefan Muller for his excellent advice in getting me
pointed in the right direction with compiling FG. However, at some 90%
done I've run into two snags.
The CVS download of FlightGear has a SimGear project in the Fli
Jon S. Berndt writes:
> I don't know if this matters, but remember that not too long ago we
> added the ability to enter aero coefficients in several coordinate
> systems - including BODY and WIND, etc.
so if i were to represent the wind tunnel data in x,y,z axis then the
drag due to horizontal t
I've been carrying on with my experiments with my FGPositioned idea,
and I now have several of my original steps done:
- Fix, NavRecord, Airport and Runway all inherit the base class
- they all live on the heap, where previously Runway and Fix were
stack based, and hence rather heavy to wor
On 5 Sep 2008, at 17:21, James Turner wrote:
Yep, that's quite a likely source - thanks for the help, I'll work out
from this.
Got it.
If someone could kindly apply the attached patch, that'll keep this
from crashing, I believe. The fix is easy since FGAirport can now
always provide an a
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:54 PM, Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I also see that (I'm only looking at the speedbrakes effects).
> > Two things are unclear for me:
> > 1. The values of alpha in f16.xml are exactly half those in NASA's
> > TP1538 report.
> > 2. The values of the coeff
5 matches
Mail list logo
