Hi,
driver version? glxgears works? Please post the output of glxinfo.
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 8:17 AM, John Wojnaroski wrote:
> I recently setup a dual core 64-bit machine with FG-1.0 which works just
> fine.
>
> Now doing the same with a single core 64 bit machine. After instaling
> OSG-2.6.
Hi All,
After today's CVS update (~8:00AM, CET), I'm only seeing approximately 10
meters of scenery around me, using my customized camera setup (attached
below). The more distant scenery is clipped off. In addition, I just noticed
something that looks like a double rendering artefact: Some aspe
I recently setup a dual core 64-bit machine with FG-1.0 which works just
fine.
Now doing the same with a single core 64 bit machine. After instaling
OSG-2.6.0 tried to run an example program and got
the following error
[cas...@rampart OpenSceneGraph]$ osgparticle
Error: Unabl
Hi there,
Is there any chance of having aircraft download pages for 1.0.0 on the
FG web site?
I've been asked from some users and friends of mine for how to
download aircraft for 1.0.0. Most of their machines are a bit older
and thus not able to run FG smoothly.
We have nice download page
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> seeing reports that the big black box is often met with a FBO error, I began
> to look at our way to render to texture. And I found this piece of code in
> od_gauge.cxx, line 63 :
>
> camera->setRenderTargetImplementation(osg::Camera::FRAME_BUFFER_OBJECT,
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 12:09 AM, Rob Shearman, Jr. wrote:
> I take it that patch didn't make it to Fred's build from today? The second
> e-mail was sent using the 20081230 build. Otherwise, something else is
> apparently going on there. -R.
No, it wasn't in CVS ye
Hi,
seeing reports that the big black box is often met with a FBO error, I began to
look at our way to render to texture. And I found this piece of code in
od_gauge.cxx, line 63 :
camera->setRenderTargetImplementation(osg::Camera::FRAME_BUFFER_OBJECT,
osg::Camera::FRAME_BUFFER);
so it loo
I take it that patch didn't make it to Fred's build from today? The second
e-mail was sent using the 20081230 build. Otherwise, something else is
apparently going on there. -R.
Robert M. Shearman, Jr.
Transit Operations Supervisor,
University of Maryland Department of Transport
Rob Shearman, Jr. wrote:
> Okay -- I just finished updating with
> Fred's new binary and CVS update, and duplicated the flight, and it
> happened again. Weird thing is, I was JUST climbing through about
> 17,000 when I was thinking, "gee, this is going well so far. I
> wonder what the METAR
On 12/30/2008 02:51 AM, Alasdair Campbell wrote:
> I wonder if there is a case for introducing a -v
> (--verbose) option for turning all occurences these statements ON via an
> IFDEF condition.
That's a reasonable question. As previously mentioned, the answer
is SG_LOG. However, AFAICT SG_LOG i
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Rob Shearman, Jr. wrote:
>
> I took the UFO back to that approximate spot and got the METAR info...
>
> 2008/12/30 17:42
> KHRJ 301742Z AUTO 10SM CLR 17/M11 A3005 RMK AO2
>
> ... but am curious as to why this bug doesn't affect the UFO?
>
> Has any of this been any
Okay -- I just finished updating with Fred's new binary and CVS update, and
duplicated the flight, and it happened again. Weird thing is, I was JUST
climbing through about 17,000 when I was thinking, "gee, this is going well so
far. I wonder what the METAR is," and looked at it and noticed the
Additional JSBsim FDM initialization-related bugs:
62:: I observe that in a JSBsim aircraft e.g. c182rg, after departing
the runway via the location-in-air menu item, there remains "weight
on wheels". That is, the gear/wow property remains true. It appears
to remain true forever, long after t
Hello all --
Just moments ago I started up the Citation Bravo and departed KRDU
(Raleigh-Durham, NC, USA) and turned to heading 150. As I was climbing through
FL200 I froze up and got the unending stream of "Detected NAN" messages.
http://fgfs.i-net.hu/modules/fgtracker/?FUNCT=FLIGHT&FLIGHTID=
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 5:03 AM, James Turner wrote:
>
> On 30 Dec 2008, at 09:51, Alasdair Campbell wrote:
>
> > Looking initially at the atis.cxx, ATCmgr.cxx, etc code I notice a
> > bunch
> > of commented-out "cout" statements, which give me a good idea of where
> > to look for solutions. I wo
Also if I'm not mistaken, the current version of the Bravo alters the startup
field-of-view from default of 55 to 60; would that make it more prone to
problems in this area? -R.
Robert M. Shearman, Jr.
Transit Operations Supervisor,
University of Maryland Department of Transportation
also know
On 12/30/2008 02:51 AM, Alasdair Campbell wrote:
> I am currently engaged in trying to solve an annoying problem (bug) with
> the ATIS/real-weather-fetch code.
>
> I find that if I have a comm radio tuned to an ATIS frequency
> in .fgfsrc, fgfs will start up with a default (erroneous) weather
> re
I've just had a lockup while landing (with a tuned GS) in the Bravo,
due to a Mk-VIII glitch. It's getting stuck in a loop around about
Mode5Handler::update_soft/get_soft_bias/is_soft, with either some
uninitialised values or memory corruption.
It's possible this is a local problem to my bui
On 30 Dec 2008, at 11:03, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> Modified Files:
> dynamicloader.cxx
> Log Message:
> Win32 fixes
Thanks Fred.
--
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
On 30 Dec 2008, at 09:51, Alasdair Campbell wrote:
> Looking initially at the atis.cxx, ATCmgr.cxx, etc code I notice a
> bunch
> of commented-out "cout" statements, which give me a good idea of where
> to look for solutions. I wonder if there is a case for introducing
> a -v
> (--verbose) o
I am currently engaged in trying to solve an annoying problem (bug) with
the ATIS/real-weather-fetch code.
I find that if I have a comm radio tuned to an ATIS frequency
in .fgfsrc, fgfs will start up with a default (erroneous) weather
report. This can only be resolved by switching the comm radio t
James Turner wrote
> -Original Message-
> From: [mailto:j...@baron.flightgear.org]
> Sent: 29 December 2008 22:23
> To: flightgear-cvsl...@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/src/Airports runwaybase.cxx,
> NONE,1.1 runwaybase.hxx, NONE, 1.1 Makefile.am, 1.14,1
22 matches
Mail list logo
