Re: [Flightgear-devel] New member...and questions ;-)

2009-06-25 Thread Olivier Faivre
Very clear explanations. Thanks ! Stay tuned for the next question ;-) Olivier 2009/6/25 Maik Justus > Hi > Heiko Schulz schrieb am 25.06.2009 22:06: > > > > Hi, > > > > ... > > > > >Can I use the "mstab" command to specify the outer wing and the > > regular "wing" command for the inner one ?

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Seneca II not working after today's simgear update that fixed the screens

2009-06-25 Thread Jon S. Berndt
> Jon, > > Ron Jensen suggested this idea as a solution for the multiple FDM > subtrees. It seems to work fine in FlightGear. Would it also work for > your multiple FDM work in JSBSim/CVS? Anders (and Ron), I'll test this out as soon as I can. It may be a few days. Jon Index: src/FDM/JSBSim/F

Re: [Flightgear-devel] property system extensions redux

2009-06-25 Thread Tim Moore
Mathias Fröhlich wrote: > Hi Tim, > > On Thursday 25 June 2009 10:22:54 Tim Moore wrote: >> OK, but in case you hadn't noticed, libsgmath depends on OSG. > Yes I have noticed that change in the quaternion/matrix. If you mean the methods in SGGeod that return osg::Matrix, I wrote them that way beca

[Flightgear-devel] FlightGear Newsletter July 2009

2009-06-25 Thread Stuart Buchanan
Hi All, Curt recently posted to the Forum (http://www.flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5201) regarding creating a FlightGear Newsletter. This is something that I had thought about for some time, and I suspect many other people have too over the years. As I had some unexpected spare t

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Seneca II not working after today's simgear update that fixed the screens

2009-06-25 Thread Anders Gidenstam
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Jon S. Berndt wrote: > This is a result of my experimenting with the multiple FDM feature again - > which is not ready, but which should be innocuous. Apparently it's not. Did > you use the JSBSim.cxx from JSBSim CVS? I think I can fix this fairly > easily. Jon, Ron Jensen s

Re: [Flightgear-devel] New member...and questions ;-)

2009-06-25 Thread Maik Justus
Hi Heiko Schulz schrieb am 25.06.2009 22:06: > > Hi, > > ... > > >Can I use the "mstab" command to specify the outer wing and the > regular "wing" command for the inner one ? > >In the readme file, I read this for mstab : these surfaces are not > involved with the solver computation these surface

Re: [Flightgear-devel] New member...and questions ;-)

2009-06-25 Thread Maik Justus
Hello Olivier, Olivier Faivre schrieb am 25.06.2009 20:52: > Hello guys, > ... > Actually, the wing is done with only one piece, 7° dihedral, no twist. > Can I use the "mstab" command to specify the outer wing and the > regular "wing" command for the inner one ? yes > In the readme file, I read t

Re: [Flightgear-devel] New member...and questions ;-)

2009-06-25 Thread Heiko Schulz
Hi, nice to see a X-Planer here! Welcome to FGFS! Very interesting aircrafts and nice scenerys! YASim is based on the same principles like the X-Plane-fdm, but maybe not so good in features. I'm not an expert in YASim, that's Detlef Faber and I hope he reads here. >Can I use the "mstab" command t

[Flightgear-devel] New member...and questions ;-)

2009-06-25 Thread Olivier Faivre
Hello guys, I'm a new member of the devel-list and new to FightGear too. I came from X-Plane and I have done some aircraft for this simulator ( http://xhydros.free.fr/) and I'm the webmaster of a french scenery site ( http://xpfr-scenery.fr/) In order to understand FlightGear and especially FDM,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Seneca II not working after today's simgear update that fixed the screens

2009-06-25 Thread Victhor
It's working again. Thanks! :D > On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Jon S. Berndt wrote: > > >> On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 06:59 +0200, Anders Gidenstam wrote: > >>> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Victhor wrote: > >>> Btw Jon: > >>> Reset in FlightGear yields multiple /fdm/jsbsim property subtrees. > >> > >> Here, too. > > >

Re: [Flightgear-devel] property system extensions redux

2009-06-25 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
Hi Tim, On Thursday 25 June 2009 10:22:54 Tim Moore wrote: > OK, but in case you hadn't noticed, libsgmath depends on OSG. Yes I have noticed that change in the quaternion/matrix. I believe that we should get rid of that. And yes, the vector storage is from osg. But it is a few line change to get

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Simgear-cvslogs] CVS: SimGear/simgear/structure SGWeakPtr.hxx, NONE, 1.1 SGWeakReferenced.hxx, NONE, 1.1 Makefile.am, 1.10, 1.11 SGAtomic.cxx, 1.2, 1.3 SGAtomic.hxx, 1.3, 1.4 S

2009-06-25 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
Hi, On Wednesday 24 June 2009 09:53:13 James Turner wrote: > An observation: this change has stopped SGAtomic being (by default) a > proxy for osg/OpenThreads Atomic. There's a downside to this - > OpenThreads Atomic has a specialisation (not of the template kind, but > the #ifdef kind) for OS-X

Re: [Flightgear-devel] property system extensions redux

2009-06-25 Thread Tim Moore
Curtis Olson wrote: > 2009/6/23 Mathias Fröhlich > > Well, from my point of view. I would prefer to have these. > The reason is to have something self contained here. > Sure we already rely on osg at many places. But if I build an > aplication on > simgear, I hope to have simge

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Seneca II not working after today's simgear update that fixed the screens

2009-06-25 Thread Anders Gidenstam
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Jon S. Berndt wrote: >> On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 06:59 +0200, Anders Gidenstam wrote: >>> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Victhor wrote: >>> Btw Jon: >>> Reset in FlightGear yields multiple /fdm/jsbsim property subtrees. >> >> Here, too. > > This is a result of my experimenting with the mul