Martin's correct. I made cosmetic changes to the textures themselves,
nothing outside of that like the way the mapping is done.
However, I do agree with John that perhaps some of the runway texturing
needs modifications. I tried to modify the grass and dirt runways to
integrate more seamlessly w
Part of the texture problem is with the current data format we are using -
there are a number of airports where the texture is incorrect, especially the
threshold textures - but we currently only have four options for runways. Also,
some countries use yellow textures for some airports - see (fro
On 21 Jan 2011, at 16:46, Hal V. Engel wrote:
> With this setup only the p51d stuff comes from $fg-aircraft and all other
> aircraft and shared files are pulled from $fg-root. This allows me to keep
> everything in sync with the GIT fgdata main line in $fg-root so that I don't
> have to worr
Heiko wrote
> >
> > Of course, there is nothing illegal about this - and only a
> > bit immoral.
> >
> > Vivian
>
> I'm not sure about. Some time ago I downloaded it as well, and I think
> Durk did the same. We found out that it is broken, so it can't be
> compiled.
>
> With this it would be ill
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 02:12:32 +0100, Arnt wrote in message
<20110114021232.6bd1c06f@celsius.local>:
> Hi,
>
> ..just upgraded from Debian Sid's FG-1.9.1 to FG-2.0.0-2,
> framerates stayed up ok @ ~ 12-15 fps. These screenshots:
> https://github.com/gasguru/flightgearthings/raw/master/fgfs-screen
Hi,
>
> Of course, there is nothing illegal about this - and only a
> bit immoral.
>
> Vivian
I'm not sure about. Some time ago I downloaded it as well, and I think Durk did
the same. We found out that it is broken, so it can't be compiled.
With this it would be illegal.
On Friday, January 21, 2011 05:25:27 am Alan Teeder wrote:
> --
> From: "Frederic Bouvier"
> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 11:52 AM
> To: "FlightGear developers discussions"
>
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGrun and --fg-aircraft
>
> > Yes, th
Gene wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Erik Hofman wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 18:57 -0500, r...@aol.com wrote:
> >> http://www.pilotsofamerica.com/forum/showthread.php?p=667522#post667522
> >>
> >> Thought you'd find this interesting
> >
> > Sure, the guy you quoted it only posts scam rela
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:56 AM, James Turner wrote:
> Actually the search has *always* been recursive - for years, by the look of
> it. I use the same (refactored) code to support all aircraft dirs, both the
> default one in fg-data, and the additional ones. Obviously I didn't want to
> break
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 20:40:32 +0100, Arnt wrote in message
<20110118204032.158726e2@celsius.local>:
> how much disk space do I need now?
>
arnt@celsius:~/FG-git$ du -sch *
6.5MAtlas
508Kcompilation_log.txt
8.0KdebCreator-2.0.0.tar.gz
8.0KdebCreator.tar.gz
32K download_and_co
> Is it 2011&UTF8 now?
BTW, I don't know what 2011 relates to, except the current year ;-)
-Fred
--
Frédéric Bouvier
http://www.youtube.com/user/fgfred64 Videos
--
Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE
--
From: "Gene Buckle"
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 2:10 PM
To: "FlightGear developers discussions"
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fwd: Internet domain name & keyword
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Curtis Olson wrote:
>
>> See attached email below ...
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:19:37 +0100 (CET), Frederic wrote in message
<32132876.1461071295615977643.javamail.r...@spooler4-g27.priv.proxad.net>:
> - "Vadym Kukhtin" a écrit :
> >
>
>
> It is also possible to submit new translations if your language use
> the latin alphabet.
> >
>
> > Is
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Curtis Olson wrote:
> See attached email below ...
>
> I never know how to read these sorts of messages. It could be spam trying
> to get us to register our domain with them so they make more money. Or it
> could be a legitimate courtesy email. I don't think I want to perso
See attached email below ...
I never know how to read these sorts of messages. It could be spam trying
to get us to register our domain with them so they make more money. Or it
could be a legitimate courtesy email. I don't think I want to personally be
responsible for registering flightear .
b
--
From: "Frederic Bouvier"
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 11:52 AM
To: "FlightGear developers discussions"
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGrun and --fg-aircraft
> Yes, that's true. For a reason I don't know, I missed that one.
> For the moment
- "Vadym Kukhtin" a écrit :
>
It is also possible to submit new translations if your language use the latin
alphabet.
>
> Is it 2011&UTF8 now?
Not yet. I am migrating slowly to fltk 1.3 that has utf8, but no release :(
That's why the latin alphabet is mandatory for the moment
-Fred
2011/1/21 Frederic Bouvier
> It is also possible to submit new translations if your language use the
> latin alphabet.
>
Is it 2011&UTF8 now?
--
---
WBR, Vadym.
--
Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a
Yes, that's true. For a reason I don't know, I missed that one.
For the moment, fg-aircraft is not used in the aircraft chooser.
-Fred
- "Alan Teeder" a écrit :
> Fgrun however does not seem to see any aircraft that are only in
> the --fg-aircraft path.
--
Frédéric Bouvier
http://www.youtu
I have the following set up :-
(Windows, current git)
--fg-root=C:/FlightGear/data
--fg-scenery=C:/FlightGear/Scenery;C:/FlightGear/terrasync
--fg-aircraft=C:/FlightGear/Aircraft
Fgrun however does not seem to see any aircraft that are only in
the --fg-aircraft path.
Here is the start o
Hi All,
the next FG release is imminent now. It is time to check if the FGrun
translation for your language is OK and complete. Pay attention to overlapping
or truncated text as well as untranslated sentence. It is also possible to
submit new translations if your language use the latin alphabet
John Denker wrote:
> If you want to have a serious discussion, [...]
I think he doesn't want to have a big discussion, he's just offering
textures which are making a visual difference compared to the ones
which are currently being used in FlightGear.
Aside from wether I like these particular cha
On 20 Jan 2011, at 23:47, Jacob Burbach wrote:
> Ok, that does raise another question then. In order for the 'wrong'
> method to work in any fashion, means you have to be recursively
> searching the path given by --fg-aircraft...right? Seems odd, and
> certainly serves to create ambiguity and con
23 matches
Mail list logo
