Hi Vivian,
Fred - should this work with MSVC9?
Only if the required symbols are defined.
It compiles and runs, but I get this error:
Cannot start scenery download. Rsync scenery server is undefined.
The server input in the menu item is blank, and does not accept any
input
Please pull
Please pull latest SimGear
And Flightgear too
-Fred
--
Frédéric Bouvier
http://www.youtube.com/user/fgfred64 Videos
--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool.
Fred wrote
Fred wrote
Please pull latest SimGear
And Flightgear too
Well, I thought I had - otherwise I wouldn't have re-compiled and run it,
would I? And it does compile and run - even provides error messages.
Vivian
ThorstenB wrote:
The feature reuses the terrasync sources and relies on a subversion
client. Either using built-in subversion (when libsvn is installed,
which is recommended). Otherwise, fgfs tries calling an external utility
(svn) for downloads.
I'm observing one minor issue: The SVN client
It was not a reproach. I just committed fixes at the time I sent those messages
-Fred
- Vivian Meazza a écrit :
Fred wrote
Fred wrote
Please pull latest SimGear
And Flightgear too
Well, I thought I had - otherwise I wouldn't have re-compiled and run
it,
would I? And
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:50 PM, ThorstenB bre...@gmail.com wrote:
the final GUI bits for a new feature are now in fgdata - the last
feature addition for the 2.4 release from my part... You can
download/update scenery directly from FlightGear now (main menu:
Environment = Scenery). Credit for
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Csaba Halász wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:50 PM, ThorstenB bre...@gmail.com wrote:
the final GUI bits for a new feature are now in fgdata - the last
feature addition for the 2.4 release from my part... You can
download/update scenery directly from FlightGear now (main
talked to the simulator. You could run it on one machine or on a dedicated
machine.
Gah. Brain to fast for fingers! You could run it on the SAME machine..or
on a dedicated machine... *facepalm*
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
On Wednesday 15 June 2011 07:36:51 Csaba Halász wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:50 PM, ThorstenB bre...@gmail.com wrote:
the final GUI bits for a new feature are now in fgdata - the last
feature addition for the 2.4 release from my part... You can
download/update scenery directly from
Fred
-Original Message-
It was not a reproach. I just committed fixes at the time I sent those
messages
-Fred
- Vivian Meazza a écrit :
Fred wrote
Fred wrote
Please pull latest SimGear
And Flightgear too
Well, I thought I had - otherwise I
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:07:21 -0600, Ron wrote in message
201106150807.21230.w...@jentronics.com:
On Wednesday 15 June 2011 07:36:51 Csaba Halász wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:50 PM, ThorstenB bre...@gmail.com wrote:
the final GUI bits for a new feature are now in fgdata - the last
Hi all
On http:// gitorious.org/fgx I tagged now a FGx version 2.3.0pre as a
preview which (should) work for Debian, Windows and OSX. FGx is a
small FlightGear-qt-gui-launcher project. For OSX it is a bit more
(because it is a app bundle with built-in OSG libs and all FlightGear
binaries).
Vivian Meazza wrote:
This was NOT a good time to introduce a whole new idea, just before a
release.
http://wiki.flightgear.org/Release_Plan#Detailed_Time_Schedule
June 17th is declared as being the feature freeze day. Thus, as long as
they don't commit a pile of crap to the repository, why
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Martin Spott wrote:
This is not consistent with Gene's, Csaba's and Ron's view. If you
read carefully, then you'll realize that these three guys have
primarily expressed their opinion on wether to have the GUI inside the
visual system or not.
Precisely. I was offering
Ahoy,
you'll find the verified .parking.xml files for the five said
airports here:
http://fgfs.beggabaur.de/daten/KHAF.groundnet.xml
http://fgfs.beggabaur.de/daten/KHWD.groundnet.xml
http://fgfs.beggabaur.de/daten/KOAK.groundnet.xml
http://fgfs.beggabaur.de/daten/KSFO.groundnet.xml
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Martin Spott martin.sp...@mgras.net wrote:
Vivian Meazza wrote:
[...] And I can't see any real advantage over Fred's implementation in
FGRun, which I have used for years.
Some people _do_ see a real advantage.
This is more or less consistent with Gene's,
In thinking about it a bit and being reminded of the existing HLA
interface that FlightGear has, I'm leaning toward proposing something
built with Python and the PyQT4 GUI library. Both components are
cross-platform and there is a Python binding for the CERTI HLA library
(PyHLA).
The idea
Csaba Halász wrote:
For example, if you have 2 separate scenery consumers it would make
sense if they both sent requests to the same terrasync instance. If
both included their own terrasync copy, who knows what confusion might
result (double download, svn lock, etc.).
Nobody forces you to
Csaba Halász wrote:
Finally, there could be other programs that need scenery data, would
you embed terrasync in each one? I view this as bad design.
By having a closer look at Thorsten's patches you'd realize that his
primary work was to turn the standalone program with hard-coded host-
and
Hi Alex,
Alex B. wrote:
Durk wrote[1]: [...]and the files that are still called parking are
the ones that I still need to rename / improve / verify. There are
still files called parking in the base package.
Indeed. FlightGear, as far as I understand, should be capable of
reading both formats
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Martin Spott martin.sp...@mgras.net wrote:
Csaba Halász wrote:
Finally, there could be other programs that need scenery data, would
you embed terrasync in each one? I view this as bad design.
By having a closer look at Thorsten's patches you'd realize that
Martin Spott wrote
-Original Message-
From: [mailto:martin.sp...@mgras.net]
Sent: 15 June 2011 18:36
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Heads up: scenery download / built-in
Vivian Meazza wrote:
This was NOT a good time to introduce a
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Vivian Meazza wrote:
This is indeed more or less consistent with those opinions. Csaba says:
For example, all the GUI stuff should be thrown out and left to a
launcher/control console application. Gene says: All the functionality in
the GUI could be provided in a
Gene
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Vivian Meazza wrote:
This is indeed more or less consistent with those opinions. Csaba
says:
For example, all the GUI stuff should be thrown out and left to a
launcher/control console application. Gene says: All the functionality
in
the GUI could be
Csaba Halász wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Martin Spott martin.sp...@mgras.net wrote:
Csaba Halász wrote:
Finally, there could be other programs that need scenery data, would
you embed terrasync in each one? I view this as bad design.
By having a closer look at Thorsten's patches
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Vivian Meazza wrote:
The one wrench in the works is aircraft (and their systems) that add
entries to the GUI menu items...
If you can generate a better way, or even an alternate way - I'll look at
it. Until then you're stuck with it.
I have the option of being able to
On 15.06.2011 22:57, Martin Spott wrote:
By having a closer look at Thorsten's patches you'd realize that his
primary work was to turn the standalone program with hard-coded host-
and pathnames into a neatly configurable library. The interface
between this lib and FlightGear is pretty slim,
Stupid question about dual-licensing: Can I dual-license an aircraft
under both GPL2 and CC-BY (no -SA or -NC), and still have it placed into
fgdata?
--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced
Interesting ideas , i personally like the fact that terrasync can be
enabled from the menu since i always run it from a separate terminal
anyway but did i hear the words 'add it to a launcher ???
'shudder' ok , iv'e been a linux user too long ;)
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, ThorstenB wrote:
absolutely unable to motivate - or at least keep people motivated on
working on our project. That's a major issue we have. Everyone who
spends time is welcomed by negative comments - and surprisingly many
leave. And I'm sorry to say, after reading emails
As far as I know only the stronger matters. So it simply doesn't matter if you
include another licence as the GPL always wins. As useless as copyright etc.
--- On Thu, 6/16/11, Ryan M tpbspamm...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Ryan M tpbspamm...@gmail.com
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Dual-licensing
31 matches
Mail list logo
