On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:39:20 -0700, Ryan wrote in message
<1308188360.7422.1.camel@linux-toshiba-laptop>:
> Stupid question about dual-licensing: Can I dual-license an aircraft
> under both GPL2 and CC-BY (no -SA or -NC), and still have it placed
> into fgdata?
..if you own it, you decides. Dis
As far as I know only the stronger matters. So it simply doesn't matter if you
include another licence as the GPL always wins. As useless as copyright etc.
--- On Thu, 6/16/11, Ryan M wrote:
From: Ryan M
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Dual-licensing question
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforg
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, ThorstenB wrote:
> absolutely unable to motivate - or at least keep people motivated on
> working on our project. That's a major issue we have. Everyone who
> spends time is "welcomed" by negative comments - and surprisingly many
> leave. And I'm sorry to say, after reading em
Interesting ideas , i personally like the fact that terrasync can be
enabled from the menu since i always run it from a separate terminal
anyway but did i hear the words 'add it to a launcher ???
'shudder' ok , iv'e been a linux user too long ;)
-
Stupid question about dual-licensing: Can I dual-license an aircraft
under both GPL2 and CC-BY (no -SA or -NC), and still have it placed into
fgdata?
--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
On 15.06.2011 22:57, Martin Spott wrote:
> By having a closer look at Thorsten's patches you'd realize that his
> primary work was to turn the standalone program with hard-coded host-
> and pathnames into a neatly configurable library. The interface
> between this lib and FlightGear is pretty slim
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Vivian Meazza wrote:
>> The one wrench in the works is aircraft (and their systems) that add
>> entries to the GUI menu items...
>>
>
> If you can generate a better way, or even an alternate way - I'll look at
> it. Until then you're stuck with it.
>
I have the option of bein
Csaba Halász wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
>> Csaba Halász wrote:
>>
>>> Finally, there could be other programs that need scenery data, would
>>> you embed terrasync in each one? I view this as bad design.
>>
>> By having a closer look at Thorsten's patches you'd r
Gene
>
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Vivian Meazza wrote:
>
> >>
> >
> > "This" is indeed more or less consistent with those opinions. Csaba
> says:
> > "For example, all the GUI stuff should be thrown out and left to a
> > launcher/control console application." Gene says: "All the functionality
> in
>
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Vivian Meazza wrote:
>>
>
> "This" is indeed more or less consistent with those opinions. Csaba says:
> "For example, all the GUI stuff should be thrown out and left to a
> launcher/control console application." Gene says: "All the functionality in
> the GUI could be provided
Martin Spott wrote
> -Original Message-
> From: [mailto:martin.sp...@mgras.net]
> Sent: 15 June 2011 18:36
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Heads up: scenery download / built-in
>
> "Vivian Meazza" wrote:
>
> > This was NOT a good time to int
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
> Csaba Halász wrote:
>
>> Finally, there could be other programs that need scenery data, would
>> you embed terrasync in each one? I view this as bad design.
>
> By having a closer look at Thorsten's patches you'd realize that his
> primary wo
Hi Alex,
"Alex B." wrote:
> Durk wrote[1]: "[...]and the files that are still called "parking" are
> the ones that I still need to rename / improve / verify." There are
> still files called "parking" in the base package.
Indeed. FlightGear, as far as I understand, should be capable of
reading bo
Csaba Halász wrote:
> Finally, there could be other programs that need scenery data, would
> you embed terrasync in each one? I view this as bad design.
By having a closer look at Thorsten's patches you'd realize that his
primary work was to turn the standalone program with hard-coded host-
and p
Csaba Halász wrote:
> For example, if you have 2 separate scenery "consumers" it would make
> sense if they both sent requests to the same terrasync instance. If
> both included their own terrasync copy, who knows what confusion might
> result (double download, svn lock, etc.).
Nobody forces you
In thinking about it a bit and being reminded of the existing HLA
interface that FlightGear has, I'm leaning toward proposing something
built with Python and the PyQT4 GUI library. Both components are
cross-platform and there is a Python binding for the CERTI HLA library
(PyHLA).
The idea her
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
> "Vivian Meazza" wrote:
>
>> [...] And I can't see any real advantage over Fred's implementation in
>> FGRun, which I have used for years.
>
> Some people _do_ see a real advantage.
>
>> This is more or less consistent with Gene's, Csaba's and
Ahoy,
you'll find the verified .parking.xml files for the five said
airports here:
http://fgfs.beggabaur.de/daten/KHAF.groundnet.xml
http://fgfs.beggabaur.de/daten/KHWD.groundnet.xml
http://fgfs.beggabaur.de/daten/KOAK.groundnet.xml
http://fgfs.beggabaur.de/daten/KSFO.groundnet.xml
http://fgfs.beg
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Martin Spott wrote:
> "This" is not consistent with Gene's, Csaba's and Ron's view. If you
> read carefully, then you'll realize that these three guys have
> primarily expressed their opinion on wether to have the GUI inside the
> visual system or not.
>
Precisely. I was offe
"Vivian Meazza" wrote:
> This was NOT a good time to introduce a whole new idea, just before a
> release.
http://wiki.flightgear.org/Release_Plan#Detailed_Time_Schedule
June 17th is declared as being the feature freeze day. Thus, as long as
they don't commit a pile of crap to the repository, w
Hi all
On http:// gitorious.org/fgx I tagged now a FGx version 2.3.0pre as a
"preview" which (should) work for Debian, Windows and OSX. FGx is a
small FlightGear-qt-gui-launcher project. For OSX it is a bit more
(because it is a app bundle with built-in OSG libs and all FlightGear
binaries).
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:07:21 -0600, Ron wrote in message
<201106150807.21230.w...@jentronics.com>:
> On Wednesday 15 June 2011 07:36:51 Csaba Halász wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:50 PM, ThorstenB wrote:
> > > the final GUI bits for a new feature are now in fgdata - the last
> > > feature
Fred
> -Original Message-
>
> It was not a reproach. I just committed fixes at the time I sent those
> messages
>
> -Fred
>
> - "Vivian Meazza" a écrit :
>
> > Fred wrote
> > Fred wrote
> >
> >
> > > > Please pull latest SimGear
> > >
> > > And Flightgear too
> > >
> >
> > Well, I
On Wednesday 15 June 2011 07:36:51 Csaba Halász wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:50 PM, ThorstenB wrote:
> > the final GUI bits for a new feature are now in fgdata - the last
> > feature addition for the 2.4 release from my part... You can
> > download/update scenery directly from FlightGear now
> talked to the simulator. You could run it on one machine or on a dedicated
> machine.
>
Gah. Brain to fast for fingers! "You could run it on the SAME machine..or
on a dedicated machine..." *facepalm*
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
http
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Csaba Halász wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:50 PM, ThorstenB wrote:
the final GUI bits for a new feature are now in fgdata - the last
feature addition for the 2.4 release from my part... You can
download/update scenery directly from FlightGear now (main menu:
Environmen
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:50 PM, ThorstenB wrote:
>
> the final GUI bits for a new feature are now in fgdata - the last
> feature addition for the 2.4 release from my part... You can
> download/update scenery directly from FlightGear now (main menu:
> Environment => Scenery). Credit for the idea g
It was not a reproach. I just committed fixes at the time I sent those messages
-Fred
- "Vivian Meazza" a écrit :
> Fred wrote
> Fred wrote
>
>
> > > Please pull latest SimGear
> >
> > And Flightgear too
> >
>
> Well, I thought I had - otherwise I wouldn't have re-compiled and run
> it
ThorstenB wrote:
> The feature reuses the terrasync sources and relies on a subversion
> client. Either using built-in subversion (when "libsvn" is installed,
> which is recommended). Otherwise, fgfs tries calling an external utility
> ("svn") for downloads.
I'm observing one minor issue: The SVN
Fred wrote
Fred wrote
> > Please pull latest SimGear
>
> And Flightgear too
>
Well, I thought I had - otherwise I wouldn't have re-compiled and run it,
would I? And it does compile and run - even provides error messages.
Vivian
-
30 matches
Mail list logo
