Martin Spott wrote:
>
> Well, why did this happen ? As far as I can tell no patch submission was
> unheard.
Well, there are some patches in my TG tree that I'm using here and that
might be worth considering:
https://gitorious.org/papillon81/terragear-cs/commits/master
Am I right that the mapse
Christian Schmitt wrote:
> The same as with taxidraw should be done with terragear, which also lacks
> developer power and where quite some patches are scrambled over different
> places.
Well, why did this happen ? As far as I can tell no patch submission was
unheard.
Cheers,
Martin.
-
Emmerich.. maybe we need a new documentation plan.. so u start it in your
"mother tounge".. I thinks this agood idea as your have a determined mind
and idea
I think the best way is to write "paragraphs" in plain text and later we can
all convert...
This is better than tryiing to "update the
Durk Talsma wrote:
> I've imported the complete revision history from CVS. At this stage, I
> haven't really made a desision about whether I should try to keep the CVS
> and gitorious projects synchronized, or whether we should abandon the CVS
> repository altogether.
I don't see why you should t
So shall we port it to QT then ? Im up for that.. gtk is a pain .. and much
less pain with Qt... in my x-platform experience...
pete
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Durk Talsma wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Following up on the recent discussion about FlightGear's support program,
> I''ve been poking aro
Hi All,
Following up on the recent discussion about FlightGear's support program, I''ve
been poking around in my old email archieve and found a note from David Luff,
dated May 26, 2009. In this message, David is stating that among his projects
for FlightGear, he's trying to finish the KLN89 cod
On 6 Sep 2011, at 09:12, Jörg Emmerich wrote:
> Thank you both very much for your interest and encouragement
No problem. It is great that someone is interested in the docs. Unfortunately I
think you could have saved yourself a lot of effort if you'd posted 6 months
ago :(
As you'll see from my
Jörg Emmerich wrote:
> 1) I am sure that most of our customers/users today rather read/search
> online in a WIKI and/or Forum - but I also see that some people still
> prefer a hardcopy to study.
>From my perspective the difference between a Wiki and a Manual is not
so much about the format of di
On 5 Sep 2011, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> .
> One immediate question is how you see your changes being incorporated
into to latex source code?
>
> Producing a nice PDF is quite important for a lot of people so I
wouldn't want to lose that.
On 5 Sep 2011, Peter Morgan wrote:
> .
> I still
On Monday, September 05, 2011 20:01:29 Durk Talsma wrote:
>
> I'm a little pressed for time this week, so I have to keep my response a
> little on the short side. In essence, I think that this would be any
> extremely cool feature to have. Do you already have a working copy that
> you would consid
10 matches
Mail list logo
