ThorstenB wrote:
I checked commit comments, but couldn't find anything related. Checked a
bit closer now: my best _guess_ is, it's related to the following
simgear change:
commit f1201eaebc3fbb8964e06b7ef158fd34a12901aa
Author: Mathias Froehlich
Date: Sat Aug 25 08:43:12 2012 +0200
On 6 Sep 2012, at 09:54, Martin Spott wrote:
_But_ the same model is already available in the Scenery path:
jive: 10:40:08 ~ ls -l
/export/share/FGScenery/Test/Models/Misc/entrepotblanc-ba.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 martin user 946 6. Okt 2011
There remains this strange discrepancy between what people are outraged about
and what could potentially stand in court.
Wah. They're immoral scammers by any examination. They're suckering
people into not only buying free software, but public domain materials as
well!
I think the truth
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 05:16:47 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message
k29bjv$6c7c$1...@osprey.mgras.de:
Ron Jensen wrote:
IANAL. The issues are non-commercial and attribution. The
attribution clause is effectively the BSD advertising clause, which
is a horrible idea on multiple levels.
Em 05-09-2012 21:14, Olaf Flebbe escreveu:
Hi,
You can force it by changing the TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES definition
in src/Canvas/ShivaVG/src/CMakeLists.txt to
TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES(
ShivaVG
${OPENGL_gl_LIBRARY}
${OPENGL_glu_LIBRARY}
m
)
i.e. the line with the m on
Thorsten wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Renk [mailto:thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi]
Sent: 06 September 2012 10:47
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] license
There remains this strange discrepancy between what people are outraged
about and what could
6 matches
Mail list logo
