On Tuesday 27 November 2012 07:56:02 Renk Thorsten wrote:
Binary releases on Linux are /possible/ but a pain - working with each
distro's packaging system is definitely the way to go, in my opinion.
That basically seems to require that everyone who wants most recent FG needs
to update to
On 27 Nov 2012, at 08:01, Stefan Seifert n...@detonation.org wrote:
That basically seems to require that everyone who wants most recent FG needs
to update to most recent Linux.
No it doesn't. There's nothing preventing us from providing packages for
older
distribution versions. On the
No it doesn't. There's nothing preventing us from providing packages for
older
distribution versions.
This sounds very neat, and if this works in practice, then I take my comment
back - being able to get an rpm for any major Linux distribution would be
equivalent to the Windows installer
Update: I've added new signal calculation for DME stations too. As explained
detailed in the wiki, DME uses a very high frequency range, thus it is
possible sometimes in reality to receive the VOR signal but not the DME
signal. Screenshots provided in the wiki article.
Also, TACAN reception
On 27 Nov 2012, at 12:44, Adrian Musceac kanto...@gmail.com wrote:
I have not updated the merge request with these features yet, waiting for the
new radio to make it into 'next' since it's enough code there already.
I have also added a Request for info chapter in the wiki page, asking
On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 14:53:07 James Turner wrote:
Gitorious was down this morning, or I would have already given some review
comments. However I see quite a few new versions of the patch, it would be
good to know it's 'ready' from your perspective, before reviewing. I too
would
Hi,
I've seen a couple of external radar clients for Flightgear being developed
right now.
I think that these days, with the advent of Canvas and other improvements, it
should be possible and desirable to have a realistic radar station inside
Flightgear.
At the moment, I'm only concerned
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Adrian Musceac wrote:
Hi,
I've seen a couple of external radar clients for Flightgear being developed
right now.
I think that these days, with the advent of Canvas and other improvements,
it
should be possible and desirable to have a realistic radar station
On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 15:23:13 Stuart Buchanan wrote:
I recently implemented a vertical terrain clearance radar for the Douglas
A4F Skyhawkd (a4f) using a combination of Canvas and Nasal terrain
lookups. The code is checked into git if you are interested.
My main concern when
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 09:39:42 +, Renk wrote in message
e495a106ff5f31448739e79d34138c191e169...@mbs1.ad.jyu.fi:
No it doesn't. There's nothing preventing us from providing
packages for older distribution versions.
This sounds very neat, and if this works in practice, then I take my
Stuart,
The Buccaneer in fgdata has had a terrain clearance radar for many years
now, using just the technique you describe. It's written in C++. It has a
horizontal mode - but I never got it to work satisfactorily at a frame rate
I liked.
Vivian
From: Stuart Buchanan
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Thorsten Renk wrote:- rain bug
- that still persists, rain is broken in Advanced Weather since
currently setting the rain norm doesn't necessarily generate rain as the
underlying system tries to be
Hi - I'd like to use the latest JSBsim release with FG. I've already downloaded
the latest JSBsim, what needs to be set in order to run FG with it ?
kunai090
--
Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel:
INSIGHTS What's
I have no idea
though about Nasal terrain sampling performance.
Pretty good these days - whenever a convective weather system is set up, we use
about O(1000-2000) terrain elevation sampling points to generate the
cloud-terrain interaction, they're done at a rate of 20 per frame. On my old
14 matches
Mail list logo
