On 12 Jun 2013, at 01:12, Roland Haeder wrote:
> That is maybe good to get noticed about it. And this is why I try to
> enable all features to check if they are okay or broken. :)
>
> Glad to help you out again.
Well we already have the 'all-FDMs' build on Jenkins for that reason, JPEG
facto
> Ok, I have pushed the current JSBSim/CVS version to FlightGear git.
>
> Please check for and report breakages. In case of aircraft breakages
> compare aircraft behaviour before and after the JSBSim update, if
> possible, to determine if the breakage is new or not.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Anders
That'
On 06/12/2013 12:17 AM, James Turner wrote:
> This is my fault, I will fix it.
>
> And, I should probably update one of the Jenkins slaves to have
> JPEG-factory enabled, since this has happened before.
>
> James
That is maybe good to get noticed about it. And this is why I try to
enable all featu
On 11 Jun 2013, at 23:53, Roland Haeder wrote:
> please take a look at this:
> http://pastebin.com/sFMjmxXA
>
> The most important lines here are:
> --
> /home/quix0r/fgfs/flightgear/src/Network/jpg-httpd.cxx: In member
> function ‘virtual bool FGJpegHttpd::process()’:
> /home/
James,
Done
Vivian
From: James Turner [mailto:zakal...@mac.com]
Sent: 11 June 2013 22:43
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bug 772 (Yasim on ground)
On 11 Jun 2013, at 22:01, Hyde Yamakawa wrote:
Hi, I'm a guy who submit that fix.
I
Hello all,
please take a look at this:
http://pastebin.com/sFMjmxXA
The most important lines here are:
--
/home/quix0r/fgfs/flightgear/src/Network/jpg-httpd.cxx: In member
function ‘virtual bool FGJpegHttpd::process()’:
/home/quix0r/fgfs/flightgear/src/Network/jpg-httpd.cxx:179:5
On 11 Jun 2013, at 22:01, Hyde Yamakawa wrote:
> Hi, I'm a guy who submit that fix.
> I tested today without my fix, I noticed it's been fixed!!
> There still be the pulling power but it's controllable by steering now.
>
> I'm sorry to bother all of you but I didn't know it was fixed.
> I gladl
On 11 Jun 2013, at 18:52, Anders Gidenstam wrote:
> I always use the separate terrasync binary since with it I only have to
> suffer the initial startup synchronization once per day - and not for each
> FG session.
>
> Will the separate terrasync binary use the new SVN replacement if I set
>
Ditto here with my WIP
Thanks
Alan
From: Gijs de Rooy
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 10:08 PM
To: FlightGear Development list
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] JSBSim Synch with FlightGear
Hi Anders,
> Ok, I have pushed the current JSBSim/CVS version to FlightGear git.
a very quick test flight
Hi Anders,
> Ok, I have pushed the current JSBSim/CVS version to FlightGear git.
a very quick test flight with the 747-400 showed no different behaviour than
yesterday.
I'll do some more thorough testing later this week, but so far all looks fine.
Thanks for taking care of the update!
Gijs
Ok, I have pushed the current JSBSim/CVS version to FlightGear git.
Please check for and report breakages. In case of aircraft breakages
compare aircraft behaviour before and after the JSBSim update, if
possible, to determine if the breakage is new or not.
Cheers,
Anders
--
-
Hi, I'm a guy who submit that fix.
I tested today without my fix, I noticed it's been fixed!!
There still be the pulling power but it's controllable by steering now.
I'm sorry to bother all of you but I didn't know it was fixed.
I gladly withdraw my request.
I will report what change fixed the is
Gary
I agree with all of this.
I have just tested the 777-200 in a moderate crosswind. First time I ever
used it. There is a tendency to fly up into wind once the main wheels are on
the deck, but nothing which can't be handled with a bootfull of rudder.
Perhaps a little more rudder authorit
James
As requested (windows 7, MSVC10 (32bit build):
(Sorry)
Alan
3> terrasync.cxx
3>C:/FlightGear/simgear\simgear/io/SVNRepository.hxx(58): error C2059:
syntax error : 'constant'
3>C:/FlightGear/simgear\simgear/io/SVNRepository.hxx(65): error C2143:
syntax error : missing ';' before '}'
3>C:
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Alex Romosan wrote:
> wouldn't it better to have something like this:
>
>FGPropertyManager pm =
> FGPropertyManager((FGPropertyNode*)globals->get_props() );
>fdmex = new FGFDMExec(&pm);
>
> that way we don't leak an FGPropertyManager object on each reset. seems
> to w
Anders Gidenstam writes:
>
> 2.
> The JSBSim class FGPropertyManager was previously derived from
> SGPropertyNode, but isn't now. This affects the creation of the
> main JSBSim object (FGFDMExec) since it requires a FGPropertyManager
> instance to access the property tree.
>
> I have currently
With respect, I'd prefer to hold off on this "fix" until we have more test
data and additional input by experienced Flightgear users. Which planes
exhibit this tendency under what exact conditions? What version of
Flightgear is being used? Under what OS? Did this effect begin to occur
after a speci
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:09:27 +0200, James wrote in message
<068d459e-8a17-4403-89b1-92606456d...@mac.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> Hyde has submitted a work-around for issue 772, which you can see
> here:
>
> https://gitorious.org/fg/flightgear/merge_requests/1572
..does this test for _both_ speed
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, James Turner wrote:
> (BTW, the option to use rsync or external, command-line svnclient still
> exists, and will be retained - though I am curious if anyone still uses
> those options!)
I always use the separate terrasync binary since with it I only have to
suffer the init
James
> Sent: 11 June 2013 13:09
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Bug 772 (Yasim on ground)
>
> Hi all,
>
> Hyde has submitted a work-around for issue 772, which you can see here:
>
> https://gitorious.org/fg/flightgear/merge_requests/1572
>
> He'd li
Hi,
I've pushed some code to Git, which will ultimately replace our use of libSvn,
and hence simplify build and deployment, especially on Mac and Windows. This
has an immediate benefit for end-users too: TerraSync will use pretty much half
the disk space it currently does, since unlike a real S
Hi all,
Hyde has submitted a work-around for issue 772, which you can see here:
https://gitorious.org/fg/flightgear/merge_requests/1572
He'd like this merged before the freeze (actually it's a fix so it can be
merged afterwards, but still), I'd like to hear any opinions on if this is a
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013, Erik Hofman wrote:
> On 06/10/2013 10:12 AM, Anders Gidenstam wrote:
>> On Sun, 9 Jun 2013, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
>>
>>> Can I request that the current version of JSBSim that is in our cvs as of
>>> this moment be synched to FlightGear as early as convenient for the
>>> synch-e
23 matches
Mail list logo
