Re: [Flightgear-devel] 2.12 is branched

2013-08-21 Thread Stuart Buchanan
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Gijs de Rooy wrote: > Don't have much time today for further troubleshooting unfortunately; should > have some after my last exam tomorrow ;-) Hi Gijs, Have you had the chance to look at this at all, and did Geoff's suggestion help? Do we have any active Win dev

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 2.12 is branched

2013-08-21 Thread James Turner
On 21 Aug 2013, at 15:28, Stuart Buchanan wrote: > On a related note, once the build problem is resolved, could we > generate a full installation RC package for testing? It would make it > easier for testers not familiar with Git to use it, and would be quite > handy for people like myself who

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 2.12 is branched

2013-08-21 Thread Stuart Buchanan
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 3:51 PM, James Turner wrote: > On a related note, once the build problem is resolved, could we > generate a full installation RC package for testing? It would make it > easier for testers not familiar with Git to use it, and would be quite > handy for people like myself who

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 2.12 is branched

2013-08-21 Thread James Turner
On 21 Aug 2013, at 16:03, Stuart Buchanan wrote: > Now all we need is someone with enough Windows knowledge to fix the > build. I've put some cash down to buy a cheap PC box for running Windows+Linux so I can debug these issues (and a few other Windows ones which are bugging me). Probably won

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Updated 707

2013-08-21 Thread Stuart Buchanan
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:34 AM, James Turner wrote: > Given that Innis has given the all-clear, what is the next step? I'm happy > to simply checkout a particular branch from the repo above and commit the > files to fgdata, but there are other options. Not sure what the other options are, but a s

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 2.12 is branched

2013-08-21 Thread Gijs de Rooy
Hi, > Stuart wrote: > Now all we need is someone with enough Windows knowledge to fix the build. the Win32 builds work fine now, only FGRun for Win64 is failing. It builds fine on my machine, but on Jenkins it cannot find two Boost files. ..\..\fgrun\src\wizard_funcs.cxx(38): fatal error C1083

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear voice communication

2013-08-21 Thread Clement de l'Hamaide
Hi all, Registration can be really usefull if some of our user are considering there is too many "children" on the frequency. Ebery body has the possibility to setup its own FGCom server disabling the "guest:guest" account and only accept registered pilot on their server. In this case server ad

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 2.12 is branched

2013-08-21 Thread Geoff McLane
Hi James, On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 16:08 +0100, James Turner wrote: > > I've put some cash down to buy a cheap PC box > for running Windows+Linux so I can debug these > issues (and a few other Windows ones which are > bugging me). > This is really WONDERFUL news ;=)) MSVC has a very powerful

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear voice communication

2013-08-21 Thread Thomas Maass
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! Nice work! Will it be possible in the future to use different sound devices for fgcom and the simulator to get only the fgcom voice via the soundcard with the headset connected? For example using the main soundcard for fg and a usb headset for the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear voice communication

2013-08-21 Thread Guy Brand
On Aug 21, Clement de l'Hamaide wrote: Hello >FGCom standalone is not yet ready for the new FGCom server because he >use an old "positions.txt" file. If you upgrade your server now every >OpenRadar/FGCom standalone user won't be able to connect to most of >frequencies and here is