* Stuart Buchanan -- Wednesday 31 January 2007:
> I suggest using the latter, or something like c172p-panel-only-set.xml
>
> Some users will otherwise associate it with the --enable-fullscreen
> option.
OK. Good point. c172p-panel-only-set.xml is fine.
m.
---
--- Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Curtis Olson -- Wednesday 31 January 2007:
> > Please! Let's call it something "obvious" that hopefully won't
> confuse
> > people, or at least when people get confused we can give them a short
> > obvious clarification.
>
> Yes, that was the idea. :-)
> The *-set.
* Curtis Olson -- Wednesday 31 January 2007:
> Please! Let's call it something "obvious" that hopefully won't confuse
> people, or at least when people get confused we can give them a short
> obvious clarification.
Yes, that was the idea. :-)
The *-set.xml file isn't critical, as this is probabl
Please! Let's call it something "obvious" that hopefully won't confuse
people, or at least when people get confused we can give them a short
obvious clarification.
Curt.
On 1/31/07, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
There used to be an --aircraft=c172-610x-jsbsim which was a
c172 with fullscreen, hires
There used to be an --aircraft=c172-610x-jsbsim which was a
c172 with fullscreen, hires panel. It got removed because it
confused some users. I would like to re-introduce that *-set.xml
file under a new name that should even tell the dullest user
that the fact that there's no OTW view is not a bug.
5 matches
Mail list logo
