@Curt: in the media subforum ;-)
> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:46:08 +0100
> From: joac...@gmx.de
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Final 2.6.0 Release Preparations
>
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:38:59 -0600
> Curtis Olson wrote:
>
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:38:59 -0600
Curtis Olson wrote:
> Obviously I need to steer clear of images that show development or testing
> features that are not yet available in the v2.6 release
What about custom scenery?
Joe
I would also like to put a call out for screen shots for the v2.6 release.
What I'm looking for is an honest representation of FlightGear v2.6, but
of course shown in the best light/angles/environment possible. I'm ok with
images generated from pre-releases or release candidates. Obviously I nee
ThorstenB wrote:
> Every free, open source project is really driven by active community
> _participation_, [...]
I overly agree with the opinions presented by the two Thorsten's !
Aside from that I'd like to point out that I'm having mixed feelings
concerning the prominent use of the term "comm
> The FlightGear development team is happy to announce the v2.6.0
> release of FlightGear, the free, open-source flight simulator. This
> new version contains many exciting new features, enhancements and
> bugfixes. Major improvements from v2.4.0 include reduced AI aircraft
> load times, easier gra
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 10:16 AM, ThorstenB wrote:
> Every free, open source project is really driven by active community
> _participation_, not so much by (passive) user's _requests_. In general,
> it's not even a matter of economic incentives, though this may be the
> case with FG. But you can se
Am 11.02.2012 16:32, schrieb Ron Jensen:
> I found and fixed a potential NaN and Segfault in the JSBSim propeller code
> yesterday. It could be considered a blocking bug for 2.6 to me.
Thanks, looks like a small and safe enough patch which we should push to
the 2.6.0 branch.
cheers,
Thorsten
--
On Friday 10 February 2012 04:08:32 Torsten Dreyer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> for our release of version 2.6.0 next week, we have a few open items on
> our checklist and I am kindly asking for support to get them done:
>
> 1. How are our release candidates performing? Are there any release
> blocking bug
Am 11.02.2012 10:40, schrieb thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi:
>> Best of all, the new features are based on user community requests, and
>> > not driven by economic incentives. Some of these features are already in
>> > the works for the next FG release [give continuity message about the
>> > development
> Best of all, the new features are based on user community requests, and
> not driven by economic incentives. Some of these features are already in
> the works for the next FG release [give continuity message about the
> development]
That'd be suspiciously close to dishonest advertizing. I spend
000
> From: stuar...@gmail.com
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Final 2.6.0 Release Preparations
>
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Tuomad wrote:
> > "best of all, it's open source and developed by an active group of people
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Tuomad wrote:
> "best of all, it's open source and developed by an active group of people
> with different backgrounds - a group that welcomes people like you to be
> part of the community." ?
>
>
> Or is that attempting a too big group hug? ;^)
The idea I was try
"best of all, it's open source and developed by an active group of people with
different backgrounds - a group that welcomes people like you to be part of the
community." ?
Or is that attempting a too big group hug? ;^)
//Tuomad
On 10.2.2012 19:48 Stuart Buchanan wrote:
On 10 Feb 2012, at 15
On 10 Feb 2012, at 15:25, "James A. Treacy" wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 03:09:53PM +, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
>> FlightGear features more than 400 aircraft, a worldwide scenery
>> database, detailed sky modelling, a flexible and open aircraft
>> modelling system, varied networking options,
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 03:09:53PM +, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> I've added the following as the synopsis for the changelog, which should be
> suitable:
>
> The FlightGear development team is happy to announce the v2.6.0
> release of FlightGear, the free, open-source flight simulator. This
> new
>
> The FlightGear development team is happy to announce the v2.6.0
> release of FlightGear, the free, open-source flight simulator. This
> new version contains many exciting new features, enhancements and
> bugfixes. Major improvements from v2.4.0 include reduced AI aircraft
> load times, easier
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
> 2. What is the state of our changelog?
> http://wiki.flightgear.org/Changelog_2.6.0 - Please everybody who
> contributed to the core and fgdata, check the document and fill in the gaps.
I've just gone through this, tidied up the grammar and
>
> 3. We need a short official announcement to be sent out to press, fs
> websites, newstickers, CBS, NBC, al-Arabia, ITAR-TASS et al. I'd prefer
> a native English speaker to write on or two enthusiastic paragraphs
> about FlightGear 2.6.0.
>
For my point of view it is worth to put some effort
Hi all,
for our release of version 2.6.0 next week, we have a few open items on
our checklist and I am kindly asking for support to get them done:
1. How are our release candidates performing? Are there any release
blocking bugs that should be taken care of?
2. What is the state of our changel
19 matches
Mail list logo
