Martin Spott wrote:
> Please enjoy the latest update to the Landcover Mapserver and the
> underlying database. Visit:
>
> http://mapserver.flightgear.org/
>
> enter the ICAO identifier of your favourite airfield and explore
> our landcover data.
As a by-product I added a function to calc
Martin Spott wrote:
> Currently I don't know why the scalebars behave that strange, I'll look
> at this another day.
This is fixed now: I realized that you just should set the UNITS in
the MAP header according to the units of the data you feed to the
Mapserver :-)
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_
Martin Spott wrote:
> Got it, ICAO identifiery are being displayed, handling of outline
> colours is being worked on,
O.k., I consider this small step as finished. This was a nice task for
refreshing my rusty Perl skills, starting to learn PHP and interfacing
both with a PostGIS-DB, always trying
Martin Spott wrote:
> Paul Surgeon wrote:
>> On Sunday 23 April 2006 00:17, Martin Spott wrote:
>>> Please enjoy the latest update to the Landcover Mapserver and the
>>> underlying database. Visit:
>>>
>>> http://mapserver.flightgear.org/
[...]
> Thanks ! I feel a major drwback is that the airpor
On Sunday 23 April 2006 14:36, Martin Spott wrote:
> The screenshot looks promising, but I guess it does not show these
> yellow circles. When assigning '100 120 255' I get some blueish dots.
> BTW, how does your definition of the "cities-symbol" look ?
SYMBOL
NAME "cities-symbol"
TYPE e
Paul Surgeon wrote:
> On Sunday 23 April 2006 12:38, Martin Spott wrote:
>> Thanks ! I feel a major drwback is that the airports don't have their
>> ICAO codes attached to the circles. This appears to be part of the
>> group of features that need special handling
> Ok, I'm assuming you're pu
Christian Mayer wrote:
> What I've seen is that there are only two road types. I think this could
> be limiting in the future. (As line data can dramatically increase the
> triangle count it might be necessary to switch off the smallest visible
> roads.)
Yep, this a tribute we're currently paying
On Sunday 23 April 2006 12:38, Martin Spott wrote:
> Paul Surgeon wrote:
> > On Sunday 23 April 2006 00:17, Martin Spott wrote:
> >> Please enjoy the latest update to the Landcover Mapserver and the
> >> underlying database. Visit:
> >>
> >> http://mapserver.flightgear.org/
> >
> > Looks excellen
Paul Surgeon wrote:
> On Sunday 23 April 2006 00:17, Martin Spott wrote:
>> Please enjoy the latest update to the Landcover Mapserver and the
>> underlying database. Visit:
>>
>> http://mapserver.flightgear.org/
>
> Looks excellent Martin!
Thanks ! I feel a major drwback is that the airports do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Spott schrieb:
> Please enjoy the latest update to the Landcover Mapserver and the
> underlying database. Visit:
>
> http://mapserver.flightgear.org/
I just had a quick look at Munich (EDDM). Activating all layers it looks
like that the most
On Sunday 23 April 2006 01:31, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
> Quick question. How hard (or would it be possible) to create a version
> of this tool that would run locally and use a local copy of the
> TerraGear "work" directory instead of the raw vmap0 or shapefile ...
> something that a person could us
On Sunday 23 April 2006 00:17, Martin Spott wrote:
> Please enjoy the latest update to the Landcover Mapserver and the
> underlying database. Visit:
>
> http://mapserver.flightgear.org/
Looks excellent Martin!
It certainly shows us how coarse the VMAP0 data is.
The scalebar seems to be broken t
Hi Curt,
"Curtis L. Olson" wrote:
> Martin Spott wrote:
>>Please enjoy the latest update to the Landcover Mapserver and the
>>underlying database. Visit:
>>
>> http://mapserver.flightgear.org/
[...]
> Quick question. How hard (or would it be possible) to create a version
> of this tool that wo
Martin Spott wrote:
Please enjoy the latest update to the Landcover Mapserver and the
underlying database. Visit:
http://mapserver.flightgear.org/
enter the ICAO identifier of your favourite airfield and explore
our landcover data. I _am_ aware of two drawbacks:
1.) There is a rounding
"dene maxwell" wrote:
> a couple of other observations
>
> The ICAO selector doesn't like lower-case
Aaah, didn't think of that because I always use upper case for ICAO
codes.
> The land-cover seems to be offset to the coast line (in the case of NZWN to
> the south)
This is part of a well-kno
Martin Spott wrote:
> Please enjoy the latest update to the Landcover Mapserver and the
> underlying database. Visit:
>
> http://mapserver.flightgear.org/
[...]
> 2.) the exact location of the airfield is not being displayed in the
> map.
O.k., Airport locations are available now - located
t even the significant landmarks in the right place. :-}
Thanks again Martin for your efforts
Regards
Dene
From: Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Landcover-DB Mapserver
Please enjoy the latest update to the Landcover Mapserver and the
underlying database. Visit:
http://mapserver.flightgear.org/
enter the ICAO identifier of your favourite airfield and explore
our landcover data. I _am_ aware of two drawbacks:
1.) There is a rounding error that leaves the
18 matches
Mail list logo
