--- Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> Stuart,
>
> I have problems applying that patches.
> I am not sure why but patch claims:
>
> patch: Only garbage was found in the patch input.
>
> Could you rediff that only with
> cvs diff -u
> instead of
> cvs diff -u -p -8 -w
Done. I've also run dos2unix
Stuart,
I have problems applying that patches.
I am not sure why but patch claims:
patch: Only garbage was found in the patch input.
Could you rediff that only with
cvs diff -u
instead of
cvs diff -u -p -8 -w
I would expect that this helps
Thanks!
On Sunday 01 October 2006 11:26, Buchan
--- Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
ember 2006 16:57, Buchanan, Stuart wrote:
> > Any chance this could be committed sometime, or objections raised?
> Yes, I will do so this weekend. I would like to double check that it
> does not
> break the current protocol ...
Thanks. I've only been able to test the
On Saturday 30 September 2006 16:57, Buchanan, Stuart wrote:
> Any chance this could be committed sometime, or objections raised?
Yes, I will do so this weekend. I would like to double check that it does not
break the current protocol ...
Greetings
Mathias
--- "Buchanan, Stuart" <> wrote:
> --- "Buchanan, Stuart" wrote:
> > --- Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
>
> > > Can you update your patch to avoid transmitting the type?
> >
> > Yes, but I can't provide any guarantee as to when I'll get it done.
>
> Well, whatcha know - it was less work than expected.
Hi,
On Sunday 24 September 2006 18:19, Buchanan, Stuart wrote:
> > You will actually double the amount of memory that is transmitted for
> > one property.
>
> That is true. However, transmitting the chat strings is going to represent
> a much bigger increase in message size, though I've restricte
--- "Buchanan, Stuart" wrote:
> --- Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> > Can you update your patch to avoid transmitting the type?
>
> Yes, but I can't provide any guarantee as to when I'll get it done.
Well, whatcha know - it was less work than expected.
New version available from http://www.nanjika.
--- Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> But anyway:
> You will actually double the amount of memory that is transmitted for
> one property.
That is true. However, transmitting the chat strings is going to represent
a much bigger increase in message size, though I've restricted the chat
size to 128 charact
On Saturday 23 September 2006 18:47, Buchanan, Stuart wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've written a patch to the MP code that allows text-based chat within the
> simulator.
>
> It provides the following:
> 1) Improved MP property handling. The MP code no-longer assumes all
> properties are floats. Props now
Hi All,
I've written a patch to the MP code that allows text-based chat within the
simulator.
It provides the following:
1) Improved MP property handling. The MP code no-longer assumes all
properties are floats. Props now turn at the correct RPM, and the MP
message format now supports strings and
10 matches
Mail list logo
