On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 15:11 -0700, John Denker wrote:
> On 12/20/2008 10:24 AM, Ron Jensen wrote:
>
> > Lets look instead at finding out the real reasons why the output
> > behavior is not as it should be.
> >
> > First question, prop_81in2v.xml gives a minimum and maximum propeller
> > pitch of
On 12/20/2008 04:37 PM, Ron Jensen wrote:
>> You don't need to tell me the propeller and engine interact.
>> I'm pretty sure I knew that already. That's exactly why
>> they should be tested separately.
>
> And yet, you are testing them together and posting your results.
I report my results in
On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 18:30 -0700, John Denker wrote:
> On 12/20/2008 04:37 PM, Ron Jensen wrote:
>
> >> You don't need to tell me the propeller and engine interact.
> >> I'm pretty sure I knew that already. That's exactly why
> >> they should be tested separately.
> >
> > And yet, you are tes
On 12/20/2008 08:52 PM, Ron Jensen wrote:
> Yes, 2400 is full fine. I asked about full coarse. I was under the
> impression, perhaps mistaken, that you expected the engine to turn
> faster than 1750 rpm with the lever back (coarse):
OK, sorry, most recently I misread course/fine. My bad.
Howe
4 matches
Mail list logo
