On 12/20/2008 04:37 PM, Ron Jensen wrote:

>> You don't need to tell me the propeller and engine interact.  
>> I'm pretty sure I knew that already.  That's exactly why
>> they should be tested separately.
> 
> And yet, you are testing them together and posting your results.

I report my results in the form of shaft power, torque, RPM, 
and MAP.  And each time I explain that -- in that form -- 
they are independent of the properties of the propeller.

> You've never told me what RPM you expect the engine to achieve with the
> prop set full coarse?

Except that I did.  Unless my inbox and outbox are lying
to me, on 12/20/2008 03:11 PM, I wrote in part:

>  Full forward on the prop control sets the governor for 
> 2400. 

Not coincidentally, 2400 is redline and top-of-the green
on the tachometer in the real aircraft, and not coincidentally 
also in the current FGFS c182 and c182rg, because that's 
where I put them when I did the artwork.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to