Hello all,
I would like to use Flightgear to display real-time air traffic. At the moment
I am using tracking data from this site: http://www.fly.faa.gov/ASDI/asdi.html
What I would like to be able to do is to create and control aircraft
programmatically from a c++ application.
I have tried
Hi Barry,
I did a work to a Brazilian institute past year and the software to control
the aircraft, in fact control the flighgear simulator, exactly like your
project.
I did a C module that interacts with Telnet server of FlightGear and
controls the flight using the telnet properties/commands.
I
Hi,
Though I can't help you, it sounds for me like a very
good feature for FlightGear! Real weather - real
traffic - would be great!
HHS
--- Carroll Barry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to use Flightgear to display real-time
> air traffic. At the moment I am using t
On 11/5/07, Heiko Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Though I can't help you, it sounds for me like a very
> good feature for FlightGear! Real weather - real
> traffic - would be great!
Yeah! How about setting up an mp-server feeding in real traffic? Or
even just AI? So that every client
Am Montag 05 November 2007 schrieb Carroll Barry:
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to use Flightgear to display real-time air traffic. At the
> moment I am using tracking data from this site:
> http://www.fly.faa.gov/ASDI/asdi.html
>
> What I would like to be able to do is to create and control aircr
or all the replies,
Barry.
-Original Message-
From: "Leidson Campos A. Ferreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FlightGear developers discussions"
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 12:32:26 -0300
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Programmatic control of AI traffic
Hi Barry,
I
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for the reply. Would your solution allow me to manually control what
might be thousands or aircraft?
I haven't looked into the multiplayer protocol yet because I am just using the
standalone exe on my pc. Would I be correct in thinking that I would implement
the following:
Am Montag 05 November 2007 schrieb Carroll Barry:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Thanks for the reply. Would your solution allow me to manually control
> what might be thousands or aircraft?
>
> I haven't looked into the multiplayer protocol yet because I am just using
> the standalone exe on my pc. Would I be
--- Carroll Barry wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to use Flightgear to display real-time air traffic. At the
> moment I am using tracking data from this site:
> http://www.fly.faa.gov/ASDI/asdi.html
>
> What I would like to be able to do is to create and control aircraft
> programmatically
Csaba Halász wrote:
> On 11/5/07, Heiko Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Though I can't help you, it sounds for me like a very
>> good feature for FlightGear! Real weather - real
>> traffic - would be great!
>
> Yeah! How about setting up an mp-server feeding in real traffic? Or
> ev
On Monday 05 November 2007 16:50, Csaba Halász wrote:
> On 11/5/07, Heiko Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Though I can't help you, it sounds for me like a very
> > good feature for FlightGear! Real weather - real
> > traffic - would be great!
>
> Yeah! How about setting up an mp-s
Hi,
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 07:56:22 Durk Talsma wrote:
> On Monday 05 November 2007 16:50, Csaba Halász wrote:
> > Yeah! How about setting up an mp-server feeding in real traffic? Or
> > even just AI? So that every client would see the same traffic.
>
> Note: This is moving into a slightly di
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oliver Schroeder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday 06 November 2007 07:56:22 Durk Talsma wrote:
>> On Monday 05 November 2007 16:50, Csaba Halász wrote:
>>> Yeah! How about setting up an mp-server feeding in real traffic? Or
>>> even just AI? So that every
Carroll Barry wrote:
> I don't have access to a live feed but I'm hoping to get a delayed
> one
>
perhaps, in the same way as fboweb @ http://www.fboweb.com/ has.
Aviation Data Systems (who produce fboweb.com) are listed as a Class 1 ASDI
Direct subscriber on the ASDI website - so they have acc
Hi Stuart, Thomas, Oliver
Firstly thank-you to everyone so far, some good ideas have been put forward and
It is seeming more likely that this might work.
I don't have access to a live feed but I'm hoping to get a delayed one perhaps,
in the same way as fboweb @ http://www.fboweb.com/ has.
I'll
> Tim Moore wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Oliver Schroeder wrote:
> > I really think, setting up a mp-client which feeds traffic is the right way
> > to
> > go. That way it does not matter, if the traffic is real or
artificial. And
> > best of all, flightgear it
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 09:25, Oliver Schroeder wrote:
>
> I really think, setting up a mp-client which feeds traffic is the right way
> to go. That way it does not matter, if the traffic is real or artificial.
> And best of all, flightgear itself does not need any changes at all.
> In fact, th
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 10:41, Tim Moore wrote:
>
> I'd be a bit concerned about the performance implications of this approach.
> If the intent is to run this program on the same machine as FlightGear,
> then there will need to be a fair amount of tuning to make sure that the
> real-time Flight
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 20:22, Durk Talsma wrote:
> Assuming that AI aircraft behave in a reasonably sane fashion, you'd only
> need to take care of elevation points across the runways and taxiways.
> These data could be sampled straight from the flightgear scenery, and
> perhaps stored locally
On Nov 6, 2007 8:22 PM, Durk Talsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Assuming that AI aircraft behave in a reasonably sane fashion, you'd only need
> to take care of elevation points across the runways and taxiways. These data
> could be sampled straight from the flightgear scenery, and perhaps store
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 06:56, Durk Talsma wrote:
> On Monday 05 November 2007 16:50, Csaba Halász wrote:
> > On 11/5/07, Heiko Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Though I can't help you, it sounds for me like a very
> > > good feature for FlightGear! Real weather - real
>
hmmm... good idea for mp and network.
But it still costs money to have internet and maybe
some flightschools, which want to use FGFS don't want
this because.
I think there should be still a possibility to have
this all on one pc without network.
HHS
--- leee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Tue
There's no reason why it shouldn't run on the same box as FG - it could
communicate via loopback or localhost. Ideally, FG would automatically
start a local process to use if a net or lan server isn't specified.
LeeE
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 20:17, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> hmmm... good idea fo
I'm not so keen on computing and programming - so if
this works good, I don't see any problems!
--- LeeE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> There's no reason why it shouldn't run on the same
> box as FG - it could
> communicate via loopback or localhost. Ideally, FG
> would automatically
> start
I'm not so keen on computing and programming - so if
this works good, I don't see any problems!
--- LeeE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> There's no reason why it shouldn't run on the same
> box as FG - it could
> communicate via loopback or localhost. Ideally, FG
> would automatically
> start
25 matches
Mail list logo