[Flightgear-devel] Re : Looking at a nice project from outside

2012-02-24 Thread Olivier
Hi all, Martin, > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Martin Spott wrote: > > In the mid of the last decade I've been one of those who realized that > developing a long-term strategy for the various FlightGear Scenery > ressources would be a Really Good Idea. In

[Flightgear-devel] Re : Looking at a nice project from outside

2012-02-24 Thread Olivier
Hi Yves, De : "flightg...@sablonier.ch" >I really wish we could build some kind of temporary "Scenery Team" and discuss >ideas. My proposal is to meet at IRC on day the next weeks to start >organizing, or to open a temporary group or list. (Sorry, i do not li

[Flightgear-devel] Re : Looking at a nice project from outside

2012-02-24 Thread Olivier
De : Martin Spott >I didn't track the number of hours, but, believe me, it kept me busy - >and just for the stupid reason because people neither bothered reading >our "Contribute" recommendations nor considered my advice. Hopefully, our form-based PHP scripts

[Flightgear-devel] RE : Looking at a nice project from outside

2012-02-24 Thread Frederic Bouvier
I just don't understand why these submissions are not just refused with a baked reply. You all are burning yourself and then will blame the community as a whole in anger.  Please enforce the rules ! Regards, -Fred Gijs de Rooy a écrit :  > Oliver wrote: > Goind to post it again on the newsle

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re : Looking at a nice project from outside

2012-02-24 Thread HB-GRAL
Am 24.02.12 16:25, schrieb Olivier: > Hopefully, our form-based PHP scripts will hopefully avoid quite a lot of > mistakes before uploading. However, I really think - I'm going to do it now, > that this contribute.php page is not widely known enough. Goind to post it > again on the newsletter and o

Re: [Flightgear-devel] RE : Looking at a nice project from outside

2012-02-26 Thread Martin Spott
Hi Frederic, Frederic Bouvier wrote: > I just don't understand why these submissions are not just refused > with a baked reply. I understand your point of view, anyhow it's quite difficile to find the "right" (TM) balance between enforcing a minimum quality standard and still trying to motivate