> > I remember: it's for injecting METAR temperature/pressure into the FDM.
> > No problems without that set. It's definitely a bug, but the question is
> > where? fgfs? JSBSim? Or some disagreement in between. Or does
> it only work
> > when METAR is actually activated (which it wasn't)? Anyway: t
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Jon S. Berndt -- Tuesday 04 April 2006 15:01:
* * Melchior FRANZ:
--prop:/environment/params/control-fdm-atmosphere=1
I don't know what this does [...] try again without the above prop spec.
I remember: it's for injecting METAR temperature/pressure int
* Jon S. Berndt -- Tuesday 04 April 2006 15:01:
* * Melchior FRANZ:
> > --prop:/environment/params/control-fdm-atmosphere=1
> I don't know what this does [...] try again without the above prop spec.
I remember: it's for injecting METAR temperature/pressure into the FDM.
No problems without that
> Add this (which is in my $FG_HOME/preferences.xml):
>
> --prop:/environment/params/control-fdm-atmosphere=1
>
> and don't ask *me* what it is good for. ;-)
>
> m.
I don't know what this does, but all bets are off (and there's nothing I can
do) unless you use the default JSBSim atmosphere mode
> I notice a couple of things here:
>
> 1) According to the visuals (and the flight characteristics) the spoilers
> are deployed when the sim starts up with these options you give, above.
BTW: what would cause spoilers to be deployed at startup?
Jon
---
* Jon S. Berndt -- Tuesday 04 April 2006 14:02:
> 3) The help menu items for two of the three aircraft help selections gives
> the same dialog. (the bottom menu items are disabled - the two above those
> give the same dialog pop up).
This is intentional and a fallback mechanism for aircraft withou
> * Jon S. Berndt -- Tuesday 04 April 2006 01:40:
> > Any inputs on how to duplicate this problem quick and insight
> into a cause
> > would be helpful.
>
> I didn't start on ground, but with this command line (relevant
> parts only):
>
> $ fgfs --aircraft=737-300 --airport=KSNS --altitude=3 -
* Jon S. Berndt -- Tuesday 04 April 2006 07:54:
> > The reason why I don't remember exactly is that I had tried the 737 a few
> > dozens of times with AP before that, because I was working on an improved
> > version of the autopilot.xml dialog.
> Is this a new problem? Did it occur with 0.9.9?
Wo
> The reason why I don't remember exactly is that I had tried the 737 a few
> dozens of times with AP before that, because I was working on an improved
> version of the autopilot.xml dialog.
>
> m.
Is this a new problem? Did it occur with 0.9.9?
Jon
---
* Melchior FRANZ -- Tuesday 04 April 2006 07:36:
> I didn't start on ground, but with this command line (relevant parts only):
>
> $ fgfs --aircraft=737-300 --airport=KSNS --altitude=3 --heading=320
> --vc=440 --prop:/controls/gear/gear-down=false --timeofday=noon
> --disable-
* Jon S. Berndt -- Tuesday 04 April 2006 01:29:
* > Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > I reached ~310,000 ft, but an unexpected shortage of fuel forced me
> > down again (with Mach 1.5).
> Can you do this without the autopilot?
Could this make a difference? Doesn't the autopilot just operate the normal
co
> > * Stefan Seifert -- Monday 03 April 2006 21:49:
> > > Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > > > flying with Mach 1.00 at 250,000 ft,
> >
> > > a little higher, and you won't come back.
> >
> > I reached ~310,000 ft, but an unexpected shortage of fuel forced me
> > down again (with Mach 1.5).
> >
> > m.
>
>
> * Stefan Seifert -- Monday 03 April 2006 21:49:
> > Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > > flying with Mach 1.00 at 250,000 ft,
>
> > a little higher, and you won't come back.
>
> I reached ~310,000 ft, but an unexpected shortage of fuel forced me
> down again (with Mach 1.5).
>
> m.
This kind of sucks. I'
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 22:52:45 +0200, Melchior wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Stefan Seifert -- Monday 03 April 2006 21:49:
> > Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > > flying with Mach 1.00 at 250,000 ft,
>
> > a little higher, and you won't come back.
>
> I reached ~310,000 ft, but an unexpected s
* Stefan Seifert -- Monday 03 April 2006 21:49:
> Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > flying with Mach 1.00 at 250,000 ft,
> a little higher, and you won't come back.
I reached ~310,000 ft, but an unexpected shortage of fuel forced me
down again (with Mach 1.5).
m.
--
15 matches
Mail list logo
