Re: [Flightgear-devel] is linux ppc version non-functional?

2008-09-18 Thread Arnt Karlsen
for FlightGear live CD, put your session on an usb key or on disk so you don't have to waste time on your next sessions, it might teach us a few useful things. > Regards, > > > > > --- On Wed, 9/17/08, David Slocombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > From: David

Re: [Flightgear-devel] is linux ppc version non-functional?

2008-09-18 Thread Saurabh Gupta
the axis and buttons on it. btw any more suggestions for that radeon? Regards, --- On Wed, 9/17/08, David Slocombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: David Slocombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] is linux ppc version non-functional? >

Re: [Flightgear-devel] is linux ppc version non-functional?

2008-09-17 Thread David Slocombe
Saurabh: As you have "direct rendering: Yes" and you are using a radeon, but you are getting < 1 fps (and some other GL apps work fine)... If you are getting some warning message about fallback to software rendering in the xterm that you started fgfs in, which you will see when you exit the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] is linux ppc version non-functional?

2008-09-17 Thread Anders Gidenstam
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Saurabh Gupta wrote: > I actually meant 24bit.. 32 was typo. > also the ssh server is VERY responsive while the fgfs servers dont respond. The working or non-working of the FlightGear MP servers does not affect your FlightGear's performance further than that more AI/MP model

Re: [Flightgear-devel] is linux ppc version non-functional?

2008-09-17 Thread Saurabh Gupta
Hi Arnt, I paid heed to your recommendations for xorg. That didnt make any difference though. >> with 32bit it gave me >> 1240 fps in its default window and 170 in full screen > >..and with 24bpp? ;o) I actually meant 24bit.. 32 was typo. also the ssh server is VERY responsive while the fgfs se

Re: [Flightgear-devel] is linux ppc version non-functional?

2008-09-16 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 19:58:19 +0200, Stefan wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tuesday, 16. September 2008, Saurabh Gupta wrote: > > this is > > ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility M7 LW [Radeon Mobility 7500] > > That's six generations and seven years behind current graphics > hardware

Re: [Flightgear-devel] is linux ppc version non-functional?

2008-09-16 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 07:32:50 -0700 (PDT), Saurabh wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > First of all thanks for the response. > > > --- On Mon, 9/15/08, Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > From: Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >

Re: [Flightgear-devel] is linux ppc version non-functional?

2008-09-16 Thread Stefan Seifert
On Tuesday, 16. September 2008, Saurabh Gupta wrote: > this is > ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility M7 LW [Radeon Mobility 7500] That's six generations and seven years behind current graphics hardware. I don't know too much about FG's requirements, but I'd bet that this card just doesn't matc

Re: [Flightgear-devel] is linux ppc version non-functional?

2008-09-16 Thread Saurabh Gupta
First of all thanks for the response. --- On Mon, 9/15/08, Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] is linux ppc version non-functional? > To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Date: Monda