Hi Yurik,
Thank you, That was very helpful. I have finished my animations now.
I would like to add, the order in which the animations are placed in the
.xml file is also important. As long as the xml.animations are in the same
order as the ac.objects, back to front, then everything looks good.
On Thursday 25 January 2007 14:44, AJ MacLeod wrote:
On Thursday 25 January 2007 10:21, Yurik V. Nikiforoff wrote:
There are objects with transparent textures - part of visual model or 3d
instruments. If two or more such objects overlaps, there is wrong
appearance.
I found, that
There are objects with transparent textures - part of visual model or 3d
instruments. If two or more such objects overlaps, there is wrong appearance.
Objects behind transparent texture may disappear or lost transparency. Some
models from CVS has this effect (artefacts with windows, propeller
On Thursday 25 January 2007 10:21, Yurik V. Nikiforoff wrote:
There are objects with transparent textures - part of visual model or 3d
instruments. If two or more such objects overlaps, there is wrong
appearance.
I found, that appearance of transparent objects depend from sequense this
В сообщении от 25 Январь 2007 19:44 AJ MacLeod написал(a):
There was also a simple ordering animation which could be done in the FG
XML file using a none animation type, but simply listing the objects in
object-name tags in the desired order. I'm not sure whether that still
works with OSG or
On Thursday 25 January 2007 14:07, Yurik V. Nikiforoff wrote:
I read handbook from FG distribution and here:
http://www.flightgear.org/Docs/fgfs-model-howto.html, but not found nothing
about ordering objects and transparency problem...
Yes, I can see why... that page seems quite out of date
6 matches
Mail list logo
