Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread Tim Moore
On 10/01/2009 12:13 AM, Vivian Meazza wrote: > Curt wrote > > > > ‘git implementations under windows run fine’ Who claims that? Not here > they don’t. I get constant glitches with cloned repos hanging – not only > do they hang, but I can find no way out of the situation. I’m really > p*ssed off

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread Vivian Meazza
ything but git camp today! Vivian -Original Message- From: Curtis Olson [mailto:curtol...@gmail.com] Sent: 30 September 2009 18:59 To: FlightGear developers discussions Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Gijs de Rooy wrote: Hi

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread Pete Morgan
Curtis.. Thou needs to rise up and command the people. Please dictate where we can file bugs first.. -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to atten

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread Curtis Olson
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Gijs de Rooy wrote: > Hi, > > > Curtis Olson wrote: > > > > Why not use the bug tracker at code.google.com/p/flightgear? > > Is it just me or does that project not exist? The link gives an error page > and the project > does not show up when searching for Flight

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread Pete Morgan
same here ? Gijs de Rooy wrote: > Hi, > > > Curtis Olson wrote: > > > > Why not use the bug tracker at code.google.com/p/flightgear > ? > > Is it just me or does that project not exist? The link gives an error > page and the project > does not show up whe

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread Pete Morgan
code.google.com/p/flightgea r = 404 ??? I am interested in the bug tracking bit Will make life easier for all -) Pete Krash handler FG.uk PLC Curtis Olson wrote: > I'm just not sure how productive it is to register yet another > separate google project sim

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread Gijs de Rooy
Hi, > Curtis Olson wrote: > > Why not use the bug tracker at code.google.com/p/flightgear? Is it just me or does that project not exist? The link gives an error page and the project does not show up when searching for FlightGear on Google Code. The simgear one does exist... Cheers, G

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread Curtis Olson
I'm just not sure how productive it is to register yet another separate google project simply to use the bug tracker. Why not use the bug tracker at code.google.com/p/flightgear? I've been holding off pushing any particular bug tracking system, because it really makes a lot of sense to co-locate

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread Pete Morgan
Precisley the problem is that me as amuppet doth not know where the issue ie at, and where to report. So at least if we can point users to a particular point, then they can be filtered and sorted. therby dipatched to the concerned. At the moment its real crap.. so at least I want to use goog

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread Pete Morgan
Gorilla thanks. U kinda exlained what's needed.. My vision it to "filter" the results and then have a direction of things to fix from user reports... Users are our best friends.. who can complain to their hearts content.. The issue now is that we need to "register" and recongise all the failu

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread Curtis Olson
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Pete Morgan wrote: > Curtis Olson wrote: > > I agree that a bug tracking system is a good thing. My thoughts & > > hopes are that once we finalized what we were doing with our eventual > > move away from CVS, We would move our code to a system that offers a > >

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread Pete Morgan
Curtis Olson wrote: > I agree that a bug tracking system is a good thing. My thoughts & > hopes are that once we finalized what we were doing with our eventual > move away from CVS, We would move our code to a system that offers a > number of developer features including an integrated bug trac

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread George Patterson
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:25 AM, Curtis Olson wrote: > I agree that a bug tracking system is a good thing.  My thoughts & hopes are > that once we finalized what we were doing with our eventual move away from > CVS,  We would move our code to a system that offers a number of developer > features in

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread Curtis Olson
I agree that a bug tracking system is a good thing. My thoughts & hopes are that once we finalized what we were doing with our eventual move away from CVS, We would move our code to a system that offers a number of developer features including an integrated bug tracker. Google does offer a nice