> Just curious: when you say there's "no local access",
> does this mean you're using a remote desktop,
> or is the app running over a remote X display?
> (export DISPLAY=someremote, etc)
remote display
> Perhaps the messages are showing up when the tile size
> approaches 0 in width or height, a
After further tests, I have come to more Xlib Error on using Fl_Double_Window
in a tile resize to 0.
It seems that this is not the better to design a complex Window.
At this time, I just change the Fl_Widget::visible() to remove all my errors
(adding a check against w() and h() being positive)
On 15 Dec 2011, at 14:29, David FLEURY wrote:
>
>> Sorry, I should have said "seevral places in the flush() method without
>> checking..." though mostly to call the draw() method, so if draw() is
>> internally always checking that the xid is non-null it may well be
>> fine...!
>
> Good. For now
On 16 Dec 2011, at 04:18, Greg Ercolano wrote:
>>> X_CreatePixmap: BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operation) 0x0
>>> X_CopyArea: BadDrawable (invalid Pixmap or Window parameter) 0xa00043
>>> X_FreePixmap: BadPixmap (invalid Pixmap parameter) 0xa00043
>
>> I have no local access.
>
On 12/16/11 09:12, Ian MacArthur wrote:
> [32bit vs 64bit observations]
Just to add some info to the mix: I tried a test between
two linux machines:
1) fedora 3 32bit/Xorg 6.8.1 (2004)/flwm
2) centos 5.5 64bit/Xorg 7.1.1 (2006)/flwm
I wen
On 12/16/11 09:12, Ian MacArthur wrote:
> [32bit vs 64bit observations]
Just to add some info to the mix: I tried a test between
two linux machines:
1) fedora 3 32bit/Xorg 6.8.1 (2004)/flwm
2) centos 5.5 64bit/Xorg 7.1.1 (2006)/flwm
I wen
>
> OK, though I still think there should be a Better Way!
This is why I posted ;)
[...]
> Sorry, what I meant was that when you are using an X-server (Exceed or
> otherwise) to run the apps on a Linux host, but displaying on a Windows
> host (which was the configuration you described initially)
[...]
>
> A related question might be why the 32-bit linux works whilst the 64-bit =
> does not, but that may well be some subtle difference in the way the X =
> client code on the 32/64 bit versions behaves.
>
Hum, probably not a 32/64 bits issues.
I have no dev package available for RedHat 5.5 (
[...]
>
> A related question might be why the 32-bit linux works whilst the 64-bit =
> does not, but that may well be some subtle difference in the way the X =
> client code on the 32/64 bit versions behaves.
>
May be not a 32/64 bits issues.
I have no dev package available for RedHat 5.5 (32bits)
> On 12/16/11 09:12, Ian MacArthur wrote:
> > [32bit vs 64bit observations]
>
> Just to add some info to the mix: I tried a test between
> two linux machines:
>
> 1) fedora 3 32bit/Xorg 6.8.1 (2004)/flwm
> 2) centos 5.5 64bit/Xorg 7.1.1 (2006)/flwm
>
I hav
10 matches
Mail list logo
