On 04/16/12 18:45, Fabien Costantini wrote:
>> If it's just the tree widget that's needed, I guess I have
>> to ask, before we embark on having two tree widgets in the
>> FLTK api.. perhaps I'm missing something obvious, but:
>>
>> What exactly are the benefits of Flu's
Yes, glad I read this first ;)
On 04/16/12 18:49, Fabien Costantini wrote:
> Of course read below : *NOT* to be ashamed of in any ways.
>
>> Yet, I am open to keep only one tree class if more conservative
>> opinions are emitted,as Fl_Tree is definitly a class to be ashamed of in any
>>
Of course read below : *NOT* to be ashamed of in any ways.
> Yet, I am open to keep only one tree class if more conservative opinions are
> emitted,as Fl_Tree is definitly a class to be ashamed of in any ways.
>
> We could improve it continually instead ...
__
> If it's just the tree widget that's needed, I guess I have
> to ask, before we embark on having two tree widgets in the
> FLTK api.. perhaps I'm missing something obvious, but:
>
> What exactly are the benefits of Flu's tree
> over Fl_Tree?
>From the
On 04/16/12 15:37, Fabien Costantini wrote:
>> Sounds like Fabien is willing to do the footwork
>> to port it to FLTK:
> Yes, I would but ...
>> I imagine it should be put to vote among the devs
>> to add it to the main branch, as it's a significant
>> bit of code.
> .. the
> Sounds like Fabien is willing to do the footwork
> to port it to FLTK:
Yes, I would but ...
> I imagine it should be put to vote among the devs
> to add it to the main branch, as it's a significant
> bit of code.
.. then indeed it would should be discussed what exac
On 04/16/12 12:46, Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote:
> Today I received another email from Jason Bryan telling me where on the
> sourceforge he hosted the latest FLU code:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/flufltk/?source=directory
>
> And there the license file clearly say that FLU uses the same
Today I received another email from Jason Bryan telling me where on the
sourceforge he hosted the latest FLU code:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/flufltk/?source=directory
And there the license file clearly say that FLU uses the same license as
FLTK and can be static linked with close source
[STR Closed w/Resolution]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2825
Version: 3.0
Fix Version: 3.0 (r9353)
Fixed in Subversion repository.
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2825
Version: 3.0
Fix Version: 3.0 (r9353)
___
fltk-bugs mailing list
fltk-bu
