Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2904: Native file chooser isn't exactly native on linux

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2904 Version: 1.3-feature I believe the intention is, if gtk is unavailable, it would fall back to the FLTK browser. If we had support for Qt the way we do now for GTK, i

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2904: Native file chooser isn't exactly native on linux

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2904 Version: 1.3-feature Attached file "Fl_Native_File_Chooser_GTK_test.cxx"... Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2904 Version: 1.3-feature// "$Id: $" // // FLTK native

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2904: Native file chooser isn't exactly native on linux

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2904 Version: 1.3-feature Attached file "gtk.h"... Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2904 Version: 1.3-feature#ifndef FALSE #define FALSE (0) #endif #ifndef TRUE #defi

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2904: Native file chooser isn't exactly native on linux

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2904 Version: 1.3-feature - added support for Fl_Native_File_Chooser->directory(char*) - added a "Show hidden files" toggle button - dlopen first searches for GTK3 and the

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2904: Native file chooser isn't exactly native on linux

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2904 Version: 1.3-feature Thanks Manolo! Nice addition. Would be great if you could document any gtk/linux specifics for use of FNFC in the docs, and try to hit on:

[fltk.development] RFC: decision on license to use for fltk/examples source code

Reviving this issue, as we probably should address it ASAP. Looking for dev votes on which license to use for the fltk/examples dir, as I don't think we have a firm decision on which to use and the exact wording. Because of how *examples* are meant to be c

Re: [fltk.development] RFC: decision on license to use for fltk/examples source code

Oh, and in case I wasn't clear, looking for votes on which of these to use: > 1) ISC style license (eg. open BSD see below) > 2) Zlib style (see below) > 3) MIT style (see below) > 4) GPL2 (Mike's sugg #1, see: >