Re: [fltk.development] [RFC] a new class to support Internationalization

2013-02-20 Thread Roman Kantor
I am using small code (200 lines), modified from http://number-none.com/blow/code/mo_file/index.html which is gettext compatible so standard .mo files (or memory areas) can be used. The advantage is that these .mo files are hashed with fast lookup and you can use all gettext tools to extract

Re: [fltk.development] [RFC] a new class to support Internationalization

2013-01-29 Thread Sanel Zukan
Maybe question is why FLTK does not support (GNU) gettext across whole library? This way translation strings could be handled in more standard way and you will get for free a bunch of tools or services like Transifex. Sanel On 01/28/2013 10:52 PM, Manolo Gouy wrote: I would like to get input

Re: [fltk.development] [RFC] a new class to support Internationalization

2013-01-29 Thread Ian MacArthur
On 29 Jan 2013, at 17:35, Sanel Zukan wrote: Maybe question is why FLTK does not support (GNU) gettext across whole library? This way translation strings could be handled in more standard way and you will get for free a bunch of tools or services like Transifex. Hi Sanel, I'm not clear what

[fltk.development] [RFC] a new class to support Internationalization

2013-01-28 Thread Manolo Gouy
I would like to get input from developers about whether a new class to support internationalization of FLTK apps could be useful. See:http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2929 ___ fltk-dev mailing list fltk-dev@easysw.com

Re: [fltk.development] [RFC] a new class to support Internationalization

2013-01-28 Thread Evan Laforge
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Manolo Gouy manolo.g...@univ-lyon1.fr wrote: I would like to get input from developers about whether a new class to support internationalization of FLTK apps could be useful. I don't have experience with i18n, but isn't gettext the usual solution here?