I don't see a problem with your child referencing the parent with the parent
being a base class. As long as Stage is mapped, and it contains the
collection mapping for Estimates, then you're golden. From memory it'd be
something like this:public class StageMap : ClassMap
{
Id(x=>x.Id).AsYourIdType(
any updates on plans to support this?
-d
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Fluent NHibernate" group.
To post to this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this grou
As far as I've been able to to tell my mapping is correct.
I can also map each of those columns separately.
Here is the full error that I'm getting:
FluentNHibernate.Cfg.FluentConfigurationException occurred
Message="An invalid or incomplete configuration was used while
creating a SessionFacto
Is there a way for a an item in a collection (a "many" in a one-to-
many relationship) to reference a base class of it's containing object
(the "one", so to speak =P)? Here's a simplified example to
demonstrate what I'm thinking:
public abstract class Stage : Entity {
DateTime StartingDate {
Your question isn't specifically a fluent way that I'm aware of, you're just
looking for a way to map a model formula property to the database, for
querying, but that doesn't get read out of the database (because again, it's
calculated in the model based on the other two properties). Is that correc
I have a derived class that uses a method from a value object. My
value object has first, last names, so I added a concatenation for
full name and other variations for Find() criteria.
The abbreviated version is shown below. My goal is to be able to do
something like the following p => p.Person.F
Works like a charm, thank you.
Łukasz
2009/6/16 Martin Hornagold
>
> Sounds to me like you don't need subclasses of any kind.
> You just need to tell FNH that DictionaryBase is a base type.
> If you are using S#arpArch you then modifying the IsBaseTypeConvention
> method in the AutoPersistenceMo
+1 to what Martin said
2009/6/16 Martin Hornagold
>
> Sounds to me like you don't need subclasses of any kind.
> You just need to tell FNH that DictionaryBase is a base type.
> If you are using S#arpArch you then modifying the IsBaseTypeConvention
> method in the AutoPersistenceModelGenerator to
Sounds to me like you don't need subclasses of any kind.
You just need to tell FNH that DictionaryBase is a base type.
If you are using S#arpArch you then modifying the IsBaseTypeConvention method
in the AutoPersistenceModelGenerator to the following should do the trick:
private bool IsB
Thank you Hudson,
but I still can't make it working. Could you please take a quick look
at my example ?
here are my classess (one abstract and one conrete). I have more
concrete classess like Contractor, but didn't want to include for
brevity.
public abstract class DictionaryBase : Entity
{
Yup, it's the final conversion process to the Semantic Model (although not
the final design). The Semantic Model had to be merged into the legacy
PartMap's one by one, which James has painstakingly done. It's finished. At
the moment, the only thing pending is finishing all of the Conventions in
the
Thanks for the quick answer.
Allright I am allready using github, but not with fluent-nh at the moment.
Maybe its time to fork it, and patching my own public repo?
I all ready have created some low-prio issues, and I understand your situation.
Thanks for pointing out the branch. Is ‘Mo
Sure, here's the test
[Test]
public void EmployeeMapping_IsOk()
{
new PersistenceSpecification(SessionFirebird)
.CheckProperty(c => c.Name, "Any Name")
.CheckProperty(c => c.Phone, "-")
.CheckProperty(c
As far as I'm aware, no reason that you wouldn't be able to do that (aside
from the fact that the parameterless call doesn't exist).
For now, it's probably best to create an issue for that rather than a patch.
A bunch of stuff is changing behind the scenes that hasn't been merged into
trunk yet. Al
Hi,
I am running R530 off the svn mirror.
When fluently mapping the POID generator strategy to be HiLo, why is the max_lo
value a mandatory argument, and why is it a string?
Are there any reason not to make it possible to run with the NH default value
for max_lo?
Possible:
===
I believe you want GeneratedBy.Identity()
But would you mind posting your test just in case? :)
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:24 AM, caiokf wrote:
>
> I'm trying to use FluentNHibernate over a legacy database. I'm also
> using SQLite for tests.
>
> When I try to create a test for the mappings using
I'm trying to use FluentNHibernate over a legacy database. I'm also
using SQLite for tests.
When I try to create a test for the mappings using FluentNHibernate's
PersistenceSpecification, I get the following exception:
NHibernate.Exceptions.GenericADOException : could not fetch initial
value for
In FNH, it would be a .JoinedSubClass("columnName",x=>
x.YourSubClassMappingHere);
Although as a point of contention, one of the reasons why the table per
class hierarchy is default, is because it's the easiest to use in the
database, and it's also the best performing option. Having done a fairly
c
By default, the inheritance mapping is "table per class hierarchy". I
have a "DictionaryBase" class and couple of derived classes from it.
How can I tell fnh to map all my derived classes as single tables and
not to map DictionaryBase at all ? Can be fluent or automapping,
whichever gets job done.
Have either of you looked at Rhino Security?
The first post introducing it is here:
http://ayende.com/Blog/archive/2008/01/22/Rhino-Security-Overview-Part-I.aspx
I believe it's still living in Rhino Commons.
Ben
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:17 AM, David Perfors wrote:
>
> I had the same problem,
I had the same problem, I solved it by converting the list of enums to
an string when saving it... it is not ideal, but it works.
class User
{
public IList Permissions { get;set; }
internal string PermissionsString
{
get
{
StringBuilder permissionString = new S
#2 gets my vote too. You should bare in mind that the order-by attribute can
contain any arbitrary sql statement, as long as it is valid. While possible
to provide some fluency, it'll also be a good idea to allow the user to
specify a simple string too. I did this with the Where method.
On Tue, Ju
I have the below situation that I need help figure it out.
I am using fluent nhibernate with a legacy database. I need to map
some additional columns to a dictionary(?) property in my entity
dynamically, because I do not know the number of columns and column
names and other specifications at comp
23 matches
Mail list logo
